O'Nan–Scott theorem

In mathematics, the O'Nan–Scott theorem is one of the most influential theorems of permutation group theory; the classification of finite simple groups is what makes it so useful. Originally the theorem was about maximal subgroups of the symmetric group. It appeared as an appendix to a paper by Leonard Scott written for The Santa Cruz Conference on Finite Groups in 1979, with a footnote that Michael O'Nan had independently proved the same result.

The theorem states that a maximal subgroup of the symmetric group Sym(Ω), where |Ω| = n is one of the following:

  1. Sk × Snk the stabilizer of a k-set (that is, intransitive)
  2. Sa wr Sb with n = ab, the stabilizer of a partition into b parts of size a (that is, imprimitive)
  3. primitive (that is, preserves no nontrivial partition) and of one of the following types:
  • AGL(d,p)
  • Sl wr Sk, the stabilizer of the product structure Ω = Δk
  • a group of diagonal type
  • an almost simple group

In their paper, "On the O'Nan Scott Theorem for primitive permutation groups," M.W. Liebeck, Cheryl Praeger and Jan Saxl give a complete self-contained proof of the theorem.[1] In addition to the proof, they recognized that the real power in the O'Nan–Scott theorem is in the ability to split the finite primitive groups into various types.

O'Nan–Scott types

The eight O'Nan–Scott types are as follows:

HA (holomorph of an abelian group): These are the primitive groups which are subgroups of the affine general linear group AGL(d,p), for some prime p and positive integer d ≥ 1. For such a group G to be primitive, it must contain the subgroup of all translations, and the stabilizer G0 in G of the zero vector must be an irreducible subgroup of GL(d,p). Primitive groups of type HA are characterized by having a unique minimal normal subgroup which is elementary abelian and acts regularly.

HS (holomorph of a simple group): Let T be a finite nonabelian simple group. Then M = T×T acts on Ω = T by t(t1,t2) = t1−1tt2. Now M has two minimal normal subgroups N1, N2, each isomorphic to T and each acts regularly on Ω, one by right multiplication and one by left multiplication. The action of M is primitive and if we take α = 1T we have Mα = {(t,t)|tT}, which includes Inn(T) on Ω. In fact any automorphism of T will act on Ω. A primitive group of type HS is then any group G such that MT.Inn(T) ≤ GT.Aut(T). All such groups have N1 and N2 as minimal normal subgroups.

HC (holomorph of a compound group): Let T be a nonabelian simple group and let N1N2Tk for some integer k ≥ 2. Let Ω = Tk. Then M = N1 × N2 acts transitively on Ω via x(n1,n2) = n1−1xn2 for all x ∈ Ω, n1N1, n2N2. As in the HS case, we have MTk.Inn(Tk) and any automorphism of Tk also acts on Ω. A primitive group of type HC is a group G such that MGTk.Aut(Tk)and G induces a subgroup of Aut(Tk) = Aut(T)wrSk which acts transitively on the set of k simple direct factors of Tk. Any such G has two minimal normal subgroups, each isomorphic to Tk and regular.

A group of type HC preserves a product structure Ω = Δk where Δ = T and GHwrSk where H is a primitive group of type HS on Δ.

TW (twisted wreath): Here G has a unique minimal normal subgroup N and NTk for some finite nonabelian simple group T and N acts regularly on Ω. Such groups can be constructed as twisted wreath products and hence the label TW. The conditions required to get primitivity imply that k≥ 6 so the smallest degree of such a primitive group is 606 .

AS (almost simple): Here G is a group lying between T and Aut(T ), that is, G is an almost simple group and so the name. We are not told anything about what the action is, other than that it is primitive. Analysis of this type requires knowing about the possible primitive actions of almost simple groups, which is equivalent to knowing the maximal subgroups of almost simple groups.

SD (simple diagonal): Let N = Tk for some nonabelian simple group T and integer k ≥ 2 and let H = {(t,...,t)| tT} ≤ N. Then N acts on the set Ω of right cosets of H in N by right multiplication. We can take {(t1,...,tk1, 1)| tiT}to be a set of coset representatives for H in N and so we can identify Ω with Tk1. Now (s1,...,sk) ∈ N takes the coset with representative (t1,...,tk1, 1) to the coset H(t1s1,...,tk1sk1, sk) = H(sk−1tks1,...,sk−1tk1sk1, 1)The group Sk induces automorphisms of N by permuting the entries and fixes the subgroup H and so acts on the set Ω. Also, note that H acts on Ω by inducing Inn(T) and in fact any automorphism σ of T acts on Ω by taking the coset with representative (t1,...,tk1, 1)to the coset with representative (t1σ,...,tk1σ, 1). Thus we get a group W = N.(Out(T) × Sk) ≤ Sym(Ω). A primitive group of type SD is a group GW such that NG and G induces a primitive subgroup of Sk on the k simple direct factors of N.

CD (compound diagonal): Here Ω = Δk and GHwrSk where H is a primitive group of type SD on Δ with minimal normal subgroup Tl. Moreover, N = Tkl is a minimal normal subgroup of G and G induces a transitive subgroup of Sk.

PA (product action): Here Ω = Δk and GHwrSk where H is a primitive almost simple group on with socle T. Thus G has a product action on Ω. Moreover, N = TkG and G induces a transitive subgroup of Sk in its action on the k simple direct factors of N.

Some authors use different divisions of the types. The most common is to include types HS and SD together as a “diagonal type” and types HC, CD and PA together as a “product action type."[2] Praeger later generalized the O’Nan–Scott Theorem to quasiprimitive groups in her paper "An O'Nan–Scott Theorem for Finite Quasiprimitive Permutation Groups and an Application to 2-Arc Transitive Graphs".[3]

gollark: You know, in a very real sense, local computer logins using cloud accounts are a terrible idea.
gollark: I think it's where they take your stuff *out* of hatcheries.
gollark: If you influence then hatch an egg, the hatchling will keep the influence upon teleportation.If you influence an egg and teleport it back, the influence will be lost.
gollark: As a hatchling, yes; as an egg, no.
gollark: It's probably good for getting UVs, given that modern autorefreshers can do quite a lot of views a second (4 on mine) anyway.

References

  1. Liebeck, Martin W.; Cheryl E. Praeger; Jan Saxl (1988). "On the O'Nan Scott Theorem for primitive permutation groups". J. Austral. Math. Soc. doi:10.1017/S144678870003216X. Retrieved 2013-04-24.
  2. Giudici, Michael. "The O'Nan–Scott Theorem". Retrieved 24 April 2013.
  3. Praeger, Cheryl E. (1993). "An O'Nan–Scott Theorem for Finite Quasiprimitive Permutation Groups and an Application to 2-Arc Transitive Graphs". Journal of the London Mathematical Society. s2-47 (2): 227–239. doi:10.1112/jlms/s2-47.2.227.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.