Norwalk River Valley Trail

The Norwalk River Valley Trail (NRVT) is a multi-use trail that is under construction. The plan for the trail is to run from Norwalk, Connecticut to Danbury, Connecticut stretching about 38 miles (61 km) passing through Redding, Ridgefield and Wilton. The trail currently consists of a 0.7 miles (1.1 km) section in Norwalk with the trailheads at Matthews Park and Union Street. The trail generally follows the Norwalk River.

Norwalk River Valley Trail
Location

Norwalk, CT to Danbury, CT

Length0.7 miles (current)
27 miles (planned)
TrailheadsUnion Street, Norwalk
Crescent Street, Norwalk (current section)
UseHiking, biking, jogging, cross country skiing
DifficultyEasy and level (currently). Partially handicapped accessible
Surface Asphalt or wooded
AmenitiesBenches, playground, tennis courts

The trail is controlled by each respective town it passes through. Funding is provided primarily by the state, along with some private donations.

Trail development

The idea for the Norwalk River Valley Trail aroused in 1995 to have a trail run along the Norwalk River. The future trail is to extend about 27 miles (43 km) from Calf Pasture Beach in Norwalk all the way to Danbury. Currently there is only a short segment of the trail complete in Norwalk. The Norwalk and Wilton parts of the trail are owned by the state of Connecticut. The board hopes to receive donations of money and land to obtain this trail but will most likely need to purchase some of the land themselves. In hopes of funding the initial routing for the trail, the Norwalk River Valley Trail committee has applied for a Recreational Trails Grant that is administered by the state. The group plans to finish the trail within 5 years.

Current section

The finished section in Norwalk is a short trail in comparison to the projected finished trail. The 0.7 mile paved trail stretches through a park, a playground and a historical museum. A parking lot is available at the southern trailhead.

gollark: JPEGs are lossy too. What happens if you take a poor-quality JPEG of a meme and convert it back to PNG (which is lossless)? Does it look better? No.
gollark: They don't understand how lossy compression works.
gollark: It isn't the original WAV.
gollark: It's lossy compression.
gollark: The conversion to the original MP3 *discards information* which converting to WAV later cannot get back.
KML is from Wikidata
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.