Non-dictatorship

In voting theory, non-dictatorship is a property of social choice functions which requires that the results of voting cannot simply mirror that of any single person's preferences without consideration of the other voters.

The property of non-dictatorship is satisfied if there is no single voter i with the individual preference order P, such that P is always the societal ("winning") preference order. With other words, the preferences of individual i should not always prevail.

Blind voting systems (with at least two voters) automatically satisfy the non-dictatorship property.

Arrow's impossibility theorem

Non-dictatorship is one of the necessary conditions in Arrow's impossibility theorem.[1] In Social Choice and Individual Values, Kenneth Arrow defines non-dictatorship as:

There is no voter i in {1, ..., n} such that for every set of orderings in the domain of the constitution and every pair of social states x and y, x y implies x P y.
gollark: The AGPL is a license which exists.
gollark: Wait, Minecraft is nonfree.
gollark: Oh, so you're fine with SaaS stuff, but won't run any proprietary code on your own computer?
gollark: Even the PotatOS privileged disk creator and PXsign programs are available openly!
gollark: It has a cool new update system which even does signature validation.

References
  1. Game Theory Second Edition Guillermo Owen Ch 6 pp124-5 Axiom 5 Academic Press, 1982 ISBN 0-12-531150-8


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.