Non-Archimedean geometry

In mathematics, non-Archimedean geometry[1] is any of a number of forms of geometry in which the axiom of Archimedes is negated. An example of such a geometry is the Dehn plane. Non-Archimedean geometries may, as the example indicates, have properties significantly different from Euclidean geometry.

There are two senses in which the term may be used, referring to geometries over fields which violate one of the two senses of the Archimedean property (i.e. with respect to order or magnitude).

Geometry over a non-Archimedean ordered field

The first sense of the term is the geometry over a non-Archimedean ordered field, or a subset thereof. The aforementioned Dehn plane takes the self-product of the finite portion of a certain non-Archimedean ordered field based on the field of rational functions. In this geometry, there are significant differences from Euclidean geometry; in particular, there are infinitely many parallels to a straight line through a point—so the parallel postulate fails—but the sum of the angles of a triangle is still a straight angle.[2]

Intuitively, in such a space, the points on a line cannot be described by the real numbers or a subset thereof, and there exist segments of "infinite" or "infinitesimal" length.

Geometry over a non-Archimedean valued field

The second sense of the term is the metric geometry over a non-Archimedean valued field,[3] or ultrametric space. In such a space, even more contradictions to Euclidean geometry result. For example, all triangles are isosceles, and overlapping balls nest. An example of such a space is the p-adic numbers.

Intuitively, in such a space, distances fail to "add up" or "accumulate".

gollark: Oh, I'm using the European bismuth scale.

gollark: It scores 94.3 on the standardized bismuth bismuthness scale.

gollark: I don't know what tuff is, that's definitely bismuth.

gollark: ↑ picture of bismuth

gollark: Yes, but I mostly use a laptop now because the GPU died some time ago and it's not easy to get replacements right now.

References

Robin Hartshorne, Geometry: Euclid and beyond (2000), p. 158.
Hilbert, David (1902), The foundations of geometry (PDF), The Open Court Publishing Co., La Salle, Ill., MR 0116216
Conrad, B. "Several approaches to non-archimedean geometry. In p-adic Geometry (Lectures from the 2007 Arizona Winter School). AMS University Lecture Series." Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI 41 (2008): 78.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[1] Robin Hartshorne, Geometry: Euclid and beyond (2000), p. 158.

[2] Hilbert, David (1902), The foundations of geometry (PDF), The Open Court Publishing Co., La Salle, Ill., MR 0116216

[3] Conrad, B. "Several approaches to non-archimedean geometry. In p-adic Geometry (Lectures from the 2007 Arizona Winter School). AMS University Lecture Series." Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI 41 (2008): 78.