Noboru Ogasawara

Noboru Ogasawara (小笠原 登, Ogasawara Noboru, July 10, 1888 – December 12, 1970) was a Japanese physician (dermatologist) specializing in leprosy. He was an assistant professor at the Department of Kyoto Imperial University. He insisted that leprosy was not incurable and diathesis was an important factor in the development of leprosy. He was against strict segregation of leprosy patients and met strong opposition at a Congress of leprosy.

Noboru Ogasawara
BornJuly 10, 1888
Ama, Aichi, Empire of Japan
DiedDecember 12, 1970 (1970-12-13) (aged 82)
NationalityJapan
OccupationPhysician, Assistant Professor at Kyoto University (1941 - 1948)
Known forHis view was that leprosy was not incurable and diathesis was an important factor and he met opposition

Life

He was born in Jinmokuji Cho(Ama-shi in 2010), Aichi Prefecture on July 10, 1888. After graduating from Kyoto Imperial University, he studied pharmacology, and later dermatology. In 1926, he started the treatment of leprosy, and became the head of leprosy section in 1938. He became assistant professor in 1941. He treated many patients there on an outpatient basis. In 1948 he worked at Toyohashi Hospital. Between 1957 and 1966, he worked at Amami Wakoen Sanatorium, in Amami Island, Kagoshima Prefecture. He died on December 12, 1970 at his native town.[1]

Three superstitions concerning leprosy

He wrote many papers and this was a representative paper.[2]

  • There are three superstitions concerning leprosy and each has its reasons. The first superstition is it is incurable. This is because if the disease progresses to a some degree, it leaves deformities, never to become normal in appearance. I recently heard that they will form a leprosy prevention society and will give the patients happy recreations and happy life, and this is a project based on the incurability of leprosy. Religious superstitions are disturbing our treatment of leprosy.
  • The second superstition is that leprosy is a transmittable disease. We must learn that diathesis is important in the development of leprosy, since it is transmittable to people with a certain diathesis.
  • The third superstition is that leprosy is a vicious infection. This disease has been present from the early times of Japanese history, but the infected people have been so minimal, revealing that its infectivity is very mild.

Heated debate in newspapers and at a congress of leprosy

In 1941, he made his opinions public in a newspaper called Chugai Nippou, and heated debate followed in the newspaper and Asahi Newspaper. At that time, the strict segregation policy was being taken by the state, and the "no leprosy patients in our prefecture" movement was in progress. Hiroshi Hayata, Hosaku Sakurai, both of the Kensuke Mitsuda school, attacked him. On November 14 and 15, there was heated debate between Ogasawara and scholars of the Mitsuda school. His speech was interrupted by a chairperson who stated Ogasawara admitted that leprosy was an infectious disease.[3]

In Amami Ōshima

In 1956, he went to Amami Wakoen Sanatorium, a leprosy sanatorium on Amami Ōshima. He listened to the complaints of leprosy patients, and studied kanpo or traditional Chinese medicine.

Notes
  1. Fujio Ohtani (1993), Hansen's disease Museum Noboru Ogasawara, Tofu Kyokai, Tokyo. in Japanese.
  2. Three superstitions concerning leprosy, Ogasawara N. Shindan to Chiryo. 18, 11, 1931.
  3. Inochi No Kindaishi,(2001) Fujino Y. Kamogawa Shuppan, Kyoto, p.301, The struggle of Dr. Ogasawara, In Japanese.
gollark: What did you THINK horrible constant segfaults meant?
gollark: I said, even.
gollark: I did just now!
gollark: I vaguely remembered `-fsanitize=address` existing, but this does not say anything useful.
gollark: Technically I don't *have* to, but porting all this DMP code would be not fun.

References
  • Three superstitions concerning leprosy, Ogasawara N. (1995) edited in Kindai Shomin Seikatsushi, No.20, Disease and Health, p545, San-Ichi Shoboh, Tokyo. In Japanese.
  • 大谷藤郎(1993) 『ハンセン病 資料館　小笠原 登』 藤楓協会(東京).
  • 国立療養所奄美和光園 『光仰ぐ日あるべし 南島のハンセン病療養所の50年』(1993) 柏書房.
  • 藤野豊 『「いのち」の近代史 - 「民族浄化」の名のもとに迫害されたハンセン病患者』(2001).
  • 前川嘉洋 「奄美和光園に住んだ二人の異邦人」『日本医事新報』4343(2007年)、85p.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.