Nazima

Nazima (née Mehr-un-Nissa) is a former Bollywood actress who was most famous for her roles as supporting actress in films in 1960s and early 1970s. She was born in Nashik (Maharashtra) and was known as the "Resident Sister" of Bollywood.[2]

Nazima
Born
Mehr-un-Nissa

(1946-03-25) March 25, 1946[1]
Nashik, Maharashtra, India
NationalityIndian
Other namesBaby Chand (as a child artist)
Resident Sister of Bollywood
OccupationActress
Years active1954–1975

Early life

Nazima was born as Mehr-un-Nisa on 25 March 1946 in Nasik. She was related to actresses Sharifa Bai (of 1930s) and Husn Bano (of 1940s) who happened to be her grandmother and aunt respectively. She was admitted to a high school in Mumbai (then Bombay) and being from a filmy background, she was soon cast as a child artist by the name Baby Chand in her early films.[1]

Career

Nazima started her career as a child artist in 1954 with Biraj Bahu. By 1958, she made her debut as a heroine in stunt film Princess Saaba. She went into mainstream cinema in 1961 with Umar Qaid which was directed by filmmaker Aspi Irani who was also her uncle. Then came Ziddi (1964) directed by Pramod Chakravarty, a hit. There was then Arzoo (1965) produced and directed by Ramanand Sagar, a silver jubilee runner. She won the best supporting actress award for the acting in Arzoo from the Bengal Film Journalists’ Association. Then came April Fool (1964) directed by Subodh Mukerjee which was appreciated by millions. She then acted in J. Om Prakash's Aye Din Bahar Ke (1968), which celebrated silver jubilee at many places. She also acted in Gemini's Aurat (1967), another box-office hit. In between she had acted in Vidyapati (1964) as heroine opposite veteran Bharat Bhushan. This was a Hindi picture made in Calcutta. In a 1968 interview, Nazima said that to her it was the best role of her film career containing all facets — humor, romance and emotion. However, the picture failed at the box office. She also acted in another Hindi film, Wohi Ladki (1967), produced in Calcutta opposite a newcomer Sharvendra as hero.[3]

She was nominated in the Filmfare Best Supporting Actress Category for playing Manoj Kumar's sister in the 1972 film Beimaan. Songs picturised on her include "Ae Kash Kisi Deewane Ko" from Aaye Din Bahar Ke and "Hum behanon ke Liye" from the 1969 film Anjaana.[4]

Personal life

Filmography

YearFilmCharacter/Role
1954Biraj Bahuas Baby Chand
1955Devdas
1956Dayar-e-Habib
1957Ab Dilli Door Nahin
1958Princess SaabaDebut as a heroine
Stunt Film
1961Oomar Qaid
1962Tower House
1964ZiddiSeema Singh
1964GazalKausar Ara Begum
1964Fariyad
1964April FoolAnu
1965Nishan
1965ArzooSarla
1966DillagiLajwanti
1966Aaye Din Bahar KeRachna
1967AuratAsha
1968Raja Aur RunkSujata Sujjo
1969WarisKomal
1969Tamanna
1969DoliShobha
1969AnjaanaMunni
1970Abhinetri
1971AdhikarRadha
1972Rakhi Aur Hathkadi
1972Mere Bhaiya
1972Do Yaar
1972Be-ImaanMeena
1973HoneymoonNeelu
1973ManchaliPushpa
1973Alam Ara
1974Albeli
1974Ujala Hi UjalaGita
1974Amir GaribAnju
1975SanyasiAarti
1975Dayar-e-MadinaMain lead[5]
1975Ranga KhushDevi
1975BadnaamMeena[6]
1986Love And GodStarting production in 1963 released in 1986

Awards and nominations

  • 1965: Bengal Film Journalists Association Awards - Best Supporting Actress (Hindi), Arzoo (1965)
  • 1972 - Filmfare nomination as Best Supporting Actress for Beimaan
gollark: For example:- the average person probably does *some* sort of illegal/shameful/bad/whatever stuff, and if some organization has information on that it can use it against people it wants to discredit (basically, information leads to power, so information asymmetry leads to power asymmetry). This can happen if you decide to be an activist or something much later, even- having lots of data on you means you can be manipulated more easily (see, partly, targeted advertising, except that actually seems to mostly be poorly targeted)- having a government be more effective at detecting minor crimes (which reduced privacy could allow for) might *not* actually be a good thing, as some crimes (drug use, I guess?) are kind of stupid and at least somewhat tolerable because they *can't* be entirely enforced practically
gollark: No, it probably isn't your fault, it must have been dropped from my brain stack while I was writing the rest.
gollark: ... I forgot one of them, hold on while I try and reremember it.
gollark: That's probably one of them. I'm writing.
gollark: > If you oppose compromises to privacy on the grounds that you could do something that is misidentified as a crime, being more transparent does helpI mean, sure. But I worry about lacking privacy for reasons other than "maybe the government will use partial data or something and accidentally think I'm doing crimes".

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.