Napoleonist Syndrome

The Napoleonist Syndrome is a psychological complex, or character disorder, underlying the attachment shown by members of a combatant country to the enemy leader, Napoleon.

Not to be confused with Napoleon complex.

It may be extended to cover parallel switches of allegiance in more modern times.

Nineteenth-century examples

During the 1790s, there was considerable sympathy outside France with the ideals of the French Revolution; but a decade later, after Napoleon had come to sole power, active sympathisers were much reduced in numbers:[1] the collapse of Beethoven's Napoleonist Family romance, on hearing of Bonaparte's coronation as emperor, is a prime example of the change.[2] Those Napoleonists that remained, however, came from all sides of the political spectrum - ranging from Queen Caroline to Radicals like William Hazlitt - something that has prompted a psychological explanation of their underlying motivation.[3]

The common factor in that syndrome is taken to be an ambivalent relationship to the parent or parent of origins, leading to a rejection of national authority, and its projection abroad.[4] The argument is particularly convincing in the case of a group of Radicals including Leigh Hunt and William Godwin, as well as Hazlitt - all the sons of dissenting ministers, whose religious beliefs they had rejected but whose influence on them remained substantial nevertheless.[5] Their common revolt against their fathers led to a counter-identification with the heroic figure presented by Napoleon[6] - his Promethean challenge to the existing order[7] seeming to offer a stark contrast to the narrow authoritarianism represented both by their own fathers, and by the British royal family.[8]

Literary analogues
gollark: Which still requires you to actually go through all the problems of birthing them.
gollark: Again, you seem to be missing everyone's actual thought processes, Volodymyr, unless you think that they're just lying about those being their thought processes.
gollark: Someone banning abortion is, I mean, not you specifically.
gollark: What an excellent way to entirely miss all points at once.
gollark: You're essentially causing those consequences for no particular reason.

See also

References
  1. Boyd Hilton, A Mad, Bad and Dangerous People? (Oxford 2008) p. 210
  2. M. Solomon, Beethoven Essays (Harvard 1988) p. 78-9
  3. E. Tangye Lean, The Napoleonists (1970) p. 377
  4. Boyd Hilton, A Mad, Bad and Dangerous People? (Oxford 2008) p. 210
  5. A. L. Rowse, History Today 21 (1971) p. 146
  6. L. Hudson, The Way Men Think (Essex 1993) p. 44
  7. J. Christopher Herold, The Age of Napoleon (NY 1965) p. 112-3 and p. 197
  8. J. A Howk, William Hazlitt (1977) p. 237
  9. G. Steiner, Tolstoy or Dostoevsky (Penguin 1967) p. 29-30
  10. D. Magarshack, Intro, Crime and Punishment (Penguin 1976) p. 14
  11. D. Lessing, The Golden Notebook (Penguin 1973) p. 302-4


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.