Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review

The Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review (MTTLR) is a scholarly technology law journal at the University of Michigan Law School.

Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review
DisciplineLaw review
LanguageEnglish
Publication details
History1994 to present
Publisher
FrequencySemiannually
Standard abbreviations
BluebookMich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev.
ISO 4Mich. Telecommun. Technol. Law Rev.
Indexing
ISSN1528-8625
OCLC no.60637189
Links

Overview

MTTLR is one of six legal journals published under the auspices of the University of Michigan Law School. The publication features a staff of over 50 student editors. MTTLR's office is located in the University of Michigan's Legal Research Building.

Subject Matter

MTTLR is dedicated to promoting discourse and thought on the interrelated legal, social, business and public policy issues raised by technology. MTTLR provides a forum for examination of the concerns and tensions between law and technology. The articles in MTTLR advance legal reasoning and often serve as a catalyst for critical analysis of the complex issues that deal with development of the law and technology.

Availability

MTTLR is available in both print and electronic formats. MTTLR articles can be obtained at the MTTLR website for free, while print versions are available for a fee.

History

MTTLR was founded as a joint venture between the University of Michigan Law School and Ross Business School in 1994. MTTLR was one of the first law journals available over the internet in an electronic format. MTTLR published annually for its first eight volumes, but has since moved to semiannual publication.

MTTLR Blog

In 2007, MTTLR launched a scholarly blog. The blog features posts written by student editors, guest writers, and faculty contributors. Posts on the blog vary in their length and formality, ranging from just a few sentences to lengthy discussions.

Symposia

MTTLR has hosted ten different symposia that have covered a variety of topics involving the interplay of law and technology. The most recent symposium "Privacy, Technology, and the Law," examined the legal, business, and policy issues surrounding big data and privacy.

gollark: Yes, because of the lack of commas.
gollark: It won't flag that.
gollark: `local negative_words_list = "abysmal awful appalling atrocious bad boring belligerent banal broken callous crazy cruel corrosive corrupt criminal contradictory confused damaging dismal dreadful deprived deplorable dishonest disease detrimental dishonorable dreary evil enrage fail foul faulty filthy frightful fight gross ghastly grim guilty grotesque grimace haggard harmful horrendous hostile hate horrible hideous icky immature infernal insane inane insidious insipid inelegant junk lousy malicious malware messy monstrous menacing missing nasty negative nonsense naughty odious offensive oppressive objectionable petty poor poisonous questionable reject reptilian rotten repugnant repulsive ruthless scary shocking sad sickening stupid spiteful stormy smelly suspicious shoddy sinister substandard severe stuck threatening terrifying tense ugly unwanted unsatisfactory unwieldy unsightly unwelcome unfair unhealthy unpleasant untoward vile villainous vindictive vicious wicked worthless insecure bug virus sucks dodecahedr worse" .. " sh" .. "it " .. "cr" .. "ap"`
gollark: It doesn't detect "worst" IIRC.
gollark: So they would kick you.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.