Mentalization

In psychology, mentalization is the ability to understand the mental state, of oneself or others, that underlies overt behaviour.[1] Mentalization can be seen as a form of imaginative mental activity that lets us perceive and interpret human behaviour in terms of intentional mental states (e.g., needs, desires, feelings, beliefs, goals, purposes, and reasons).[2][3] It is sometimes described as "understanding misunderstanding." Another term that David Wallin has used for mentalization is "Thinking about thinking".[4] Mentalization can occur either automatically or consciously. Mentalization ability, or mentalizing, is weakened by intense emotion.

"Mentalize" redirects here. For the album, see Mentalize (album).

Background

While the broader concept of theory of mind has been explored at least since Descartes, the specific term 'mentalization' emerged in psychoanalytic literature in the late 1960s, and became empirically tested in 1983 when Heinz Wimmer and Josef Perner[5] ran the first experiment to investigate when children can understand false belief, inspired by Daniel Dennett's interpretation of a Punch and Judy scene.

The field diversified in the early 1990s when Simon Baron-Cohen and Uta Frith, building on the Wimmer and Perner study, and others merged it with research on the psychological and biological mechanisms underlying autism and schizophrenia. Concomitantly, Peter Fonagy and colleagues applied it to developmental psychopathology in the context of attachment relationships gone awry.[6] More recently, several child mental health researchers such as Arietta Slade,[7] John Grienenberger,[8] Alicia Lieberman,[9] Daniel Schechter,[10] and Susan Coates[11] have applied mentalization both to research on parenting and to clinical interventions with parents, infants, and young children.

Implications

Mentalization has implications for attachment theory and self-development. According to Peter Fonagy, individuals with disorganized attachment style (e.g., due to physical, psychological, or sexual abuse) can have greater difficulty developing the ability to mentalize. Attachment history partially determines the strength of mentalizing capacity of individuals. Securely-attached individuals tend to have had a primary caregiver that has more complex and sophisticated mentalizing abilities. As a consequence, these children possess more robust capacities to represent the states of their own and other people’s minds. Early childhood exposure to mentalization can protect the individual from psychosocial adversity.[2][12] This early childhood exposure to genuine parental mentalization fosters development of mentalizing capabilities in the child themselves.[13][14] There is also suggestion that genuine parental mentalization is beneficial to child learning; when a child feels they are being viewed as an intentional agent, they feel contingently responded to, which promotes epistemic trust and triggers learning in the form of natural pedagogy - this increases the quality of learning in the child.[15] This theory needs further empirical support.

Research

Mentalization or better mentalizing, has a number of different facets which can be measured with various methods. A prominent method of assessment of Parental Mentalization is the Parental Development Interview (PDI), a 45-question semi-structured interview, investigating parents’ representations of their children, themselves as parents, and their relationships with their children.[16] An efficient self-report measure of Parental Mentalization is the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (PRFQ) created by Patrick Luyten and colleagues.[17] The PRFQ is a brief, multidimensional assessment of parental reflective functioning (mentalization), aimed to be easy to administer to parents in a wide range of socioeconomic populations. The PRFQ is recommended for use as a screening tool for studies with large populations and does not aim to replace more comprehensive measures, such as the PDI or observer-based measures.[18]

Fourfold dimensions

According to the American Psychiatric Association's Handbook of Mentalizing in Mental Health Practice, mentalization takes place along a series of four parameters or dimensions: Automatic/Controlled, Self/Other, Inner/Outer, and Cognitive/Affective.[19]

Each dimension can be exercised in either a balanced or unbalanced way, while effective mentalization also requires a balanced perspective across all four dimensions.[20]

  1. Automatic/Controlled. Automatic (or implicit) mentalizing is a fast-processing unreflective process, calling for little conscious effort or input; whereas controlled mentalization (explicit) is slow, effortful, and demanding of full awareness.[21] In a balanced personality, shifts from automatic to controlled smoothly occur when misunderstandings arise in a conversation or social setting, to put things right.[22] Inability to shift from automatic mentalization can lead to a simplistic, one-sided view of the world, especially when emotions run high; while conversely inability to leave controlled mentalization leaves one trapped in a 'heavy', endlessly ruminative thought-mode.[23]
  2. Self/Other involves the ability to mentalize about one's own state of mind, as well as about that of another.[24] Lack of balance means an overemphasis on either self or other.[25]
  3. Inner/Outer: Here problems can arise from an over-emphasis on external conditions, and a neglect of one's own feelings and experience.[26]
  4. Cognitive/Affective are in balance when both dimensions are engaged, as opposed to either an excessive certainty about one's own one-sided ideas, or an overwhelming of thought by floods of emotion.[27]
gollark: … yep.
gollark: I DMed you. Maybe I got the wrong daelvn.
gollark: <@261154480433659914> Did you get my suggestions for libhydraz?
gollark: Maybe your GPU is just bad.
gollark: <@151391317740486657> Do use Linux.

See also

References
  1. Anthony Bateman; Peter Fonagy (2006). Mentalization-Based Treatment for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on 2007-12-31 – via UCL Psychoanalysis Unit.
  2. Anthony Bateman; Peter Fonagy (2007). "Psychotherapy for Borderline Personality Disorder. Workshop on Mentalisation Based Treatment" (PDF) (Presentation). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-08-12.
  3. Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E.L., Target, M. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization and the development of the self. New York; Other Press
  4. Wallin, David (13 July 2009). "An Interview with David Wallin, Ph.D. on the Implications of Attachment Theory for Psychotherapy". mentalhelp.net (Interview). Interviewed by David Van Nuys. Archived from the original on 2011-10-01. Retrieved 22 Apr 2011.
  5. Wimmer, H.; Perner, J. (1983). "Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception". Cognition. 13 (1): 103–128. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5. PMID 6681741.
  6. Allen, J. P., Fonagy, P. (Eds.), Handbook of Mentalization-Based Treatment. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons
  7. Slade, A (2005). "Parental reflective functioning: An introduction". Attachment and Human Development. 7 (3): 269–283. doi:10.1080/14616730500245906. PMID 16210239.
  8. Grienenberger, JF; Kelly, K; Slade, A (2005). "Maternal reflective functioning, mother-infant affective communication, and infant attachment: Exploring the link between mental states and observed caregiving behavior in the intergenerational transmission of attachment". Attachment & Human Development. 7 (3): 299–311. doi:10.1080/14616730500245963. PMID 16210241.
  9. Lieberman, A.F.; Van Horn, P.; Ippen, C.G. (2005). "Towards evidence-based treatment: Child-parent psychotherapy with preschoolers exposed to marital violence". Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 44 (12): 1241–1248. doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000181047.59702.58. PMID 16292115.
  10. Schechter, DS; Myers, MM; Brunelli, SA; Coates, SW; Zeanah, CH; Davies, M; Grienenberger, JF; Marshall, RD; McCaw, JE; Trabka, KA; Liebowitz, MR (2006). "Traumatized mothers can change their minds about their toddlers: Understanding how a novel use of videofeedback supports positive change of maternal attributions". Infant Mental Health Journal. 27 (5): 429–448. doi:10.1002/imhj.20101. PMC 2078524. PMID 18007960.
  11. Coates, S.W. (1998). "Having a Mind of One's Own and Holding the Other In Mind". Psychoanalytic Dialogues. 8: 115–148. doi:10.1080/10481889809539236.
  12. Fonagy, P; Bateman, AW (2006). "Mechanisms of change in mentalization-based treatment of BPD". J Clin Psychol. 62 (4): 411–30. doi:10.1002/jclp.20241. PMID 16470710.
  13. Rosso, AM; Viterbori, P; Scopesi, A (2015). "Are maternal reflective functioning and attachment security associated with preadolescent mentalization?". Frontiers in Psychology. 6: 1–12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01134. PMC 4523702. PMID 26300824.
  14. Scopesi, A (2015). "Mentalizing Abilities in Preadolescents' and Their Mothers' Autobiographical Narratives". Journal of Early Adolescence. 35 (4): 467–483. doi:10.1177/0272431614535091.
  15. Fonagy, P; Allison, P (2014). "The role of mentalizing and epistemic trust in the therapeutic relationship" (PDF). Psychotherapy. 51 (3): 372–380. doi:10.1037/a0036505. PMID 24773092.
  16. "The Parent Development Interview". Retrieved 2019-02-18.
  17. "The Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (PRFQ)". UCL Psychoanalysis. Retrieved 2019-02-18.
  18. Luyten, P; Mayes, L; Nijssens, L; Fonagy, P (2017). "The parental reflective functioning questionnaire: Development and preliminary validation". PLOS ONE. 12 (5): 1–28. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176218. PMC 5417431. PMID 28472162.
  19. A Bateman, Handbook of Mentalizing in Mental Health Practice (2016) p. 8
  20. A Bateman, Handbook of Mentalizing in Mental Health Practice (2016) p. 8
  21. A Bateman, Handbook of Mentalizing in Mental Health Practice (2016) p. 8
  22. J Hagelquist, The Mentalization Handbook (2016) p. 52-3
  23. J Hagelquist, The Mentalization Handbook (2016) p. 53
  24. A Bateman, Handbook of Mentalizing in Mental Health Practice (2016) p.10
  25. J Hagelquist, The Mentalization Handbook (2016) p. 52
  26. J Hagelquist, The Mentalization Handbook (2016) p. 52
  27. A Bateman, Handbook of Mentalizing in Mental Health Practice (2016) p. 49

Further reading
  • Apperly, I. (2010). Mindreaders: The Cognitive Basis of "Theory of Mind". Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
  • Doherty, M.J. (2009). Theory of Mind: How Children Understand Others' Thoughts and Feelings. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.