Mehrangiz Manouchehrian

Mehrangiz Manouchehrian (1906-2000) is an Iranian lawyer, feminist, and appointed Senator.[1] She was involved in the Women's Organization of Iran. She was involved in drafting the Family Protection Act - a set of laws extending women's rights in marriage.[2]

Iranian women -- including Manouchehrian -- at the first female university.

Legacy

Manouchehrian's contribution to an improvement of women's rights in Iran are acknowledged. A book about her life "Senator: the Work of Senator Mehrangiz Manouchehrian in the Struggle for Legal Rights for Women" won the Latifeh Yarshater Book Award in 2004.[3]

Career

Manouchehrian was both Iran's first female lawyer and Iran's first female Senator. During her time as a Senator she was crucial in extending women's rights. Using her experience as a lawyer, she drew up the Family Protection Act, which granted women family rights. A number of elements in the proposed Act were picked out and greatly exaggerated by critics. This led to the Act becoming subject to great public debate and discussion in the media. Some members of the country's clergy claimed that the Act was not compatible with Islam, espoused loose moral standards and even considered publicly denouncing Manouchehrian as a heretic. Fearing for her safety, Manouchehrian fled Tehran for some time. [4] The Act was later repealed following the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

Manouchehrian later resigned her seat in the Senate following a dispute with the Prime Minister Jafar Sharif-Emami. After Sharif-Emami addressed her in a rude manner during a parliamentary debate, he visited her home and apologised privately.[5] However, Manouchehrian demanded a public apology which he refused to deliver. Consequently, Manouchehrian resigned.[6]

For her work in promoting women's rights, she was awarded the United Nations Prize in the Field of Human Rights in 1968.

Manouchehrian was also appointed a member of the central council of the Women's Organisation of Iran.

gollark: In the UK the police apparently *can* legally compel you to give up your passwords because UK.
gollark: Anyway, I think if you use standard and generally-considered-good cryptographic algorithms with trusted open-source implementations you're probably okay. Unless you're being actively, personally targeted by nation-states. In which case you have bigger problems.
gollark: Like I said, they can't practically ban strong encryption, just make it so that the average people's communications don't use it.
gollark: Then, anyone who uses strong crypto can be called an evil terrorist because all Good Citizens are using backdoored stuff.
gollark: Basically, the plan seems to be more to not ban encryption but just backdoor popular messaging services because TeRRoRiSm and ChIlDren.

See also

References
  1. Firoozeh Kashani-Sabet (2011). Conceiving Citizens: Women and the Politics of Motherhood in Iran. Oxford University Press. p. 180. ISBN 978-0-19-530886-0.
  2. "Women's Rights in Iran" a thesis by A DE LA CAMARA of the University of Central Florida, Orlando
  3. Book award goes to "Senator: the Work of Senator Mehrangiz Manouchehrian in the Struggle for Legal Rights for Women" and "Reading Lolita in Tehran", Payvand.com, Retrieved 10 August 2016
  4. "The Women's Organization of Iran: Evolutionary Politics and Revolutionary Change | Mahnaz Afkhami". www.mahnazafkhami.net. Retrieved 2017-03-07.
  5. "Reform and Regression: The Fate of the Family Protection Law | Foundation for Iranian Studies". fis-iran.org. Retrieved 2017-03-07.
  6. "The Feminist School". feministschool.com. Retrieved 2017-03-07.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.