Masaoka Shiki International Haiku Awards

The Masaoka Shiki International Haiku Awards, named after the founder of modern Japanese haiku, were established on the principles set forth in the Matsuyama Declaration, adopted at the Shimanamikaido '99 Haiku Convention[1] in Matsuyama held in September 1999. The establishment of this award attracts people's attention to Masaoka Shiki as a globally recognized poet and to haiku as a short form of world poetry.

Purpose

The Masaoka Shiki International Haiku Award is awarded to people who have made the most remarkable contribution to the development and the raising awareness of the creativity of haiku regardless of nationality or language. Recipients have a strong interest in haiku and a broad, international outlook in their field. The award is not limited to any field of speciality, so that haiku poets, other poets, authors, researchers, translators, essayists, editors, and workers in all professions are considered equally.

Awardees

  • The First Masaoka Shiki International Haiku Awards 2000[2]
    • Grand Prize/ Yves Bonnefoy, France
    • Haiku Prize/ Li Mang, China/ Bart Mesotten, Belgium/ Robert Spiess, United States of America
    • EIJS Special Award/ Kazuo Sato, Japan
  • The Second Masaoka Shiki International Haiku Awards 2002[3]
    • Haiku Prize/ Cor van den Heuvel, United States of America/Satya Bhushan Verma, India
    • EIJS Special Award/ Shigeki Wada, Japan
  • The Third Masaoka Shiki International Haiku Awards 2004[4]
    • Grand Prize/ Gary Snyder, United States of America
    • Haiku Prize/ Hidekazu Masuda, Brazil/Ko Reishi, Taiwan
    • EIJS Special Award/ Bansei Tsukushi, Japan
  • The Fourth Masaoka Shiki International Haiku Awards 2008[5]
    • Grand Prize/ Kaneko Tohta, Japan
    • Haiku Prize/ Kawahara Biwao, Japan
    • Haiku Prlze Sweden Award/ Uchida Sonoo, Japan/ Lee O-Young, South Korea
gollark: I think market systems are waaay better than some weird communist one at resource allocation (with intervention), so I'd prefer markets + limited central governance.
gollark: If there's some leather available, and two different production processes needing leather, how do you decide which factory gets which?
gollark: And a quota for "10 tons of nails", so they made a single 10-ton nail.
gollark: There were things with Soviet truck depots driving trucks in circles pointlessly because they had a quota of "40000 miles driven".
gollark: If your factory is told to make 100K units of winter clothing of any kind they will probably just go for the simplest/easiest one, even if it isn't very useful to have 100K winter coats (extra small) (plain white). Now, you could say "but in capitalism they'll just make the cheapest one", but companies are directly subservient to what consumers actually want and can't get away with that.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.