Mark Kelman

Mark Kelman (born August 20, 1951) is jurist and vice dean of Stanford Law School. As a prominent legal scholar, he has applied social science methodologies, including economics and psychology, to the study of law. He is one of the most cited law professors.[1] He is regarded as one of the co-founders of the critical legal studies movement and authored "A Guide to Critical Legal Studies." He is widely known for his influential[2] 1978 critique of the Coase theorem,[3] a core part of law and economics.

He graduated from Harvard College and Harvard Law School.[4]

Narrative

Being a published novelist, Kelman is well aware of the role of narrative in forming a sense of personal identity[5] - as also of the way narratives may be incriminating or exculpatory, depending on the time frame used.[6]

Thus, for example, when viewed in a long enough time-frame, a criminal act which appears at first sight the result of individual responsibility may, Kelman suggests, be instead the deterministic result of socio-economic conditions.[7]

Rational rhetoricism

Kelman argues that much in the law involves providing rational interpretative constructs that surround a non-rational core – what he terms 'rational rhetoricism'[8] with the result that, in his words, "It is illuminating and disquieting to see that we are nonrationally constructing the legal world over and over again....".[9]

Stanley Fish has proposed in rebuttal that such rhetorical constructs are in fact a necessary aspect of the human condition, and thus an inevitable facet of the legal world as well.[10]

gollark: Of course, the best way to communicate is through *lasers*. A laser going through your detection area during some amount of time is 1. No laser is 0. You can now very slowly send binary.
gollark: 7 bit/char 10Hz digital links.
gollark: I have actually written code for messaging over wireless redstone links. Not Morse code, though.
gollark: I used a chat box/recorder or something.
gollark: Very unreliable.

See also

Publications
  • Mark Kelman, What Followed Was Pure Lesley (1973)
  • Mark Kelman, 'Choice & Utility' Wisconsin Law Review 1979 (1979)
  • Mark Kelman, 'Interpretive Construction in the Substantive Criminal Law' Stanford Law Review (1981)

References
  1. http://www.leiterrankings.com/faculty/2007faculty_impact_areas.shtml
  2. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-03-19. Retrieved 2011-02-02.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  3. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/scal52&div=30&g_sent=1&collection=journals
  4. https://law.stanford.edu/directory/mark-g-kelman/
  5. Robin West, Narrative, Authority, and Law (1993) p. 254
  6. G. Binder/R. Weisberg, Literary Criticism of Law (2000) p. 264
  7. Stanley Fish, Doing What Comes Naturally (1989) p. 393-7
  8. Fish, p. 393
  9. Quoted in Fish, p. 395
  10. Fish, p. 395-6
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.