Manisha Shah

Manisha Shah is an economist, as well as Vice-Chair and Professor of Public Policy at the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs.[1] She received her PhD in economics from the University of California, Berkeley in agricultural and resource economics in 2006.[2] Additionally she is an editor at the Journal of Health Economics[3] as well as a Faculty Research Associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research, a Research Fellow at the Institute for the Study of Labor, and a Faculty Affiliate at the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab.[2]

Manisha Shah
CitizenshipUnited States
InstitutionUCLA
FieldEconomics
Development
Alma materUniversity of California, Berkeley
Doctoral
advisor
Ethan Ligon
Information at IDEAS / RePEc
Websitehttps://luskin.ucla.edu/person/manisha-shah/

Education and career

Manisha Shah received her B.A. in Economics and Development Studies from University of California at Berkeley in 1995.[2] From there she moved to the London School of Economics, completing her Masters degree in Development Studies in 1997. She then returned to Berkeley for a M.S. in Agricultural & Resource Economics in 2003, followed by a PhD in Agricultural & Resource Economics in 2006.[2]

Following her PhD, Shah was a lecturer in the University of Melbourne Department of Economics from 2006 to 2009. In 2009, she moved to UC Irvine as an Assistant Professor, as well as a Visiting Assistant Professor at Princeton University's Center for Health & Wellbeing. In 2013, she was hired as an Assistant Professor in UCLA's Department of Public Policy. In 2014, she was promoted to Associate Professor, followed by promotion to full Professor in 2018.[2]

Research and academic work

Shah's work has focused on sex work in both developing countries and the United States. Her study Risky Business: The Market for Unprotected Sex with Paul Gertler and Stefano Bertozzi was published in 2005 in the Journal of Political Economy.[4] The study focused on how beauty and willingness to have unprotected sex effected the bargaining power and earnings of sex workers in Mexico.

Shah made other contributions to our understanding of beauty's role in the organization of sex markets. For instance, in The Prostitute's Allure: The Return to Beauty in Commercial Sex Markets published with Raj Arunachalam in 2012 in B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, Shah showed further evidence that beauty was economically valued in illicit sex markets in Ecuador and Mexico.[5]

Her work has also challenged a common claim in economics that female sex workers are compensated relatively well for their low-skilled labor because they are sacrificing value in marriage prospects by engaging in sex work.[6] In a 2008 paper in the American Econimc Review: Papers & Proceedings Shah and Arunachalam provide evidence that in a sample of sex workers from Ecuador and Mexico, sex workers were more likely to be married than non-sex workers at younger ages.[7]

Shah has studied the effect of regulation and suppression of sex workers on various women's health outcomes including domestic violence and sexually transmitted infections.[8] In a 2011 paper, Gertler and Shah found that enforcing street prostitution regulations reduces STIs among street prostitutes. But, increasing enforcement in the brothel sector increases the chances that a sex worker will ever be infected with an STI, suggesting that enforcement has mixed impacts on STI dynamics depending on the target of the regulations.[9] Cunningham and Shah followed this theme with a historical study of a decriminilization of indoor sex work in Rhode Island in 2003. Here they found that the decriminalization of indoor sex work caused a 30% reduction in reported rapes and a 40% reduction in female gonorrhea incidence. The authors suggest these changes were due to increased services available to now-legitimized sex workers, as well as potential sex offenders turning to sex workers over sexual violence due to the decreased monetary and social cost of patronizing sex workers.

Shah has also contributed to our understanding of the way in which internet technology improves the functioning of male sex markets.[10] In a 2013 paper, Logan and Shah noted that internet sex markets allowed potential sex workers and clients to engage in signalling, sharing photographs with certain clients to convey safety and in return receive higher earnings.

Shah was also co-editor of the Oxford University Press Handbook for the Economics of Prostitution with Scott Cunningham in 2016.[11]

Shah has made contributions to the relationship between people's risky behaviors and natural disasters. In March 2014, Manisha Shah and Lisa Cameron, published a paper: Risk-Taking Behavior in the Wake of Natural Disasters. This paper proposes "while experiencing natural disasters, people usually tend to be more risk-averse than usual". [12]

gollark: Capacitor banks charged to capacity.
gollark: Starting up the soul absorption lasers...
gollark: Lördag was banned by GTech™ in 2006. I'm seizing your soul as a fine for breaking the laws.
gollark: As you can see, it's now a weekday.
gollark: Yep, definitely Friday now.

References

  1. "Manisha Shah - UCLA Luskin". Retrieved December 21, 2018.
  2. "Manisha Shah CV". UCLA Box. Retrieved December 21, 2018.
  3. Elsevier. "Editorial board - Journal of Health Economics - ISSN 0167-6296". www.elsevier.com.
  4. Gertler, Paul; Shah, Manisha; Bertozzi, Stefano M. (June 1, 2005). "Risky Business: The Market for Unprotected Commercial Sex". Journal of Political Economy. 113 (3): 518–550. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.194.8463. doi:10.1086/429700.
  5. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/cc55/d4ac3dd95c3b279034d8238dd153cf4e0aa0.pdf
  6. Edlund, Lena; Korn, Evelyn (November 5, 2018). "A Theory of Prostitution". Journal of Political Economy. 110 (1): 181–214. doi:10.1086/324390. JSTOR 10.1086/324390.
  7. Arunachalam R, Shah M (2008). "Prostitudes and Brides?" (PDF). American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings. 98 (2): 516–522. doi:10.1257/aer.98.2.516. Retrieved December 22, 2018.
  8. Gertler, Paul J.; Shah, Manisha (2011). "Sex Work and Infection: What's Law Enforcement Got to Do with It?". The Journal of Law & Economics. 54 (4): 811–840. doi:10.1086/661634. JSTOR 10.1086/661634.
  9. Cunningham, Scott; Shah, Manisha (December 20, 2017). "Decriminalizing Indoor Prostitution: Implications for Sexual Violence and Public Health". The Review of Economic Studies. 85 (3): 1683–1715. doi:10.1093/restud/rdx065.
  10. Logan, Trevon D.; Shah, Manisha (2013). "Face Value: Information and Signaling in an Illegal Market" (PDF). Southern Economic Journal. 79 (3): 529–564. doi:10.4284/0038-4038-2011.119. JSTOR 23809683.
  11. The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Prostitution. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford University Press. September 7, 2016. ISBN 9780199915248 via Oxford University Press.
  12. http://jhr.uwpress.org/content/50/2/484.refs
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.