Male captus bene detentus

Male captus, bene detentus (wrongly captured, properly detained) is a legal doctrine, according to which the fact that a person may have been wrongly or unfairly arrested, will not prejudice a rightful detention or trial under due process.

There is state practice in support of the doctrine,[1][2][3][4] as well as contrary state practice.[5][6][7][8][9] In one of its cases the U.S. Supreme Court held that where a person from another country is apprehended by irregular means, the right to set up as defense the unlawful manner by which he was brought to a court belongs "to the Government from whose territory he was wrongfully taken".[10]

Notes
  1. Attorney-General v. Eichmann, 36 I.L.R. 5 (1961)
  2. Frisbie v. Collins, 342 U.S. 519 (1952)
  3. United States ex el Lujan v. Gengler, 510 F.2d 62 (1975)
  4. United States v. Alvarez-Machain, 504 U.S. 655 (1992)
  5. State v. Ebrahim, 21 I.L.M. 888
  6. United States v. Toscanino, 500 F.2d 267 (1974)
  7. United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez 939 F.2d 1341 (1990)
  8. Connelly v. Director of Public Prosecutions, A.C. 1254 (1964)
  9. Bennett v. Horseferry Road Magistrates' Court, 3 All E.R. 138 (1993)
  10. Ker v. Illinois, 119 U.S. 436 (1886)


gollark: If my experience and random blog posts are anything to go by, consumer routers mostly run horrible hodgepodges of various poorly secured C programs duct-taped together and then exposed to the internet and quite possibly never updated.
gollark: I had one with a telnet interface on which you could get root access by doing `ps ; sh`.
gollark: > there's no way anyone got through my randomly generated 32-character root passwordThis is irrelevant. Routers have awful security.
gollark: We have over 110 bots and an uncountably infinite number of apioforms.
gollark: Bot count is increasingly rapidly. None are safe. [BEES EXPUNGED].
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.