Malaysia Internet Blackout Day (2012)

Malaysia Internet Blackout Day on 14 August 2012, was a series of coordinated protests occurred against a proposed laws in amendment of the Section 114A is the second of two amendments made to Malaysia’s Evidence Act 1950 by the Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ) member of IFEX and SEAPA, initiative,[1][2] this campaigning against the newly introduced Section 114A to the Evidence Act 1950—Malaysia Internet Blackout Day—by the protesters also placed their poster in their sites based on content is gaining momentum and has received more endorsements from prominent websites, netizens, and politicians were reported globally.[3][4][5]

The amendment of section 114A "makes individuals and those who administer, operate or provide spaces for online community forums, blogging, and hosting services, liable for content published through its services". This presumption of guilt goes against a fundamental principle of justice—innocent until proven guilty—and disproportionately burdens the average person who may not have the resources to defend himself in court and enables law enforcement officials to hold publishers of websites accountable for seditious, defamatory, or libellous postings even if they are not the actual authors of the content.[6]

Internet Blackout Day was also supported by media sites FreeMalaysiaToday, Malaysiakini, Digital News Asia, The Nut Graph, BFM 89.9, Merdeka Review, and party organ news sites Harakah Daily and Keadilan Daily.[5]

Background to the campaign

The Internet Blackout Day is part of a campaign to call for the repeal of the new Section 114A of the Evidence Act 1950, otherwise known as Evidence (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 2012. It began on 31 May 2012, when the Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ) launched an online petition to call on the government to withdraw the Evidence (Amendment) (No. 2) Act. The petition, which received more than 3,300 signatures, was handed over to the Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department VK Liew in Parliament on 26 June 2012.

The CIJ also organised a public forum on 12 June 2012, entitled ‘Section 114A Evidence Act: Crime-busting or Online Control?’ with lawyer Foong Cheng Leong, online activist Jac SM Kee, and tech experts A. Asohan and Jeff Sandhu to discuss about the repercussions of the amendment.

On 11 August 2012, the CIJ, along with the National Young Lawyers Committee, and Pusat Rakyat LoyarBurok co-hosted a discussion on legal implications of Section 114A with lawyers K. Shanmuga, Faisal Moideen, and Foong Cheng Leong and Member of Parliament and Deputy Higher Education Minister Saifuddin Abdullah.[5]

gollark: I feel like it's mostly high just so they can extract large amounts of money from people who are unlikely to switch brand.
gollark: Not developer tools.
gollark: Their business is selling extravagantly shiny finished products at huge markup.
gollark: Apple would *never* do that.
gollark: Apple does have really impressive ARM CPU core designs, so this isn't massively surprising.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.