MacDuff v JCI

MacDuff & Co Ltd (in Liquidation) v Johannesburg Consolidated Investment Co Ltd[1] is the leading case in South African contract law on the issue of fictional fulfilment of suspensive conditions.

Facts

The case involved two companies: Johannesburg Consolidated Investment (JCI) was a minority shareholder in Macduff & Co. JCI had entered into a contract with Macduff whereby the latter would undergo voluntary liquidation. Macduff agreed that, once liquidated, it would transfer all its assets into a newly founded company under the auspices and supervision of JCI. In the agreement was a suspensive condition which permitted liquidation only if the shareholders of Macduff agreed to it.

At the time of contracting, this was a promising deal for JCI. When market conditions changed, however, it was no longer of much economic benefit. JCI accordingly bought up shares in Macduff, until it was the majority shareholder, and then voted against liquidation, deliberately obstructing the possibility of the occurrence of the suspensive condition in the contract.

Judgment

The Appellate Division ruled that such obstruction was unlawful, and therefore that there was fictional fulfillment of the suspensive condition. JCI was thus held liable for breach of contract.

gollark: ```/ # rm -rf /*[sounds of everything being deleted]```
gollark: ```/ # rm -rf /rm: it is dangerous to operate recursively on '/'rm: use --no-preserve-root to override this failsafe```
gollark: Wait, reply channels? You monster.
gollark: <@113673208296636420> what?
gollark: Okay, the coreutils `rm` handles it okay and deletes everything.

See also

References

Books

Cases

  • MacDuff & Co Ltd (in Liquidation) v Johannesburg Consolidated Investment Co Ltd 1924 AD 573.

Notes

  1. 1924 AD 573.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.