Member of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Member of the Royal College of Psychiatrists (MRCPsych) is a postnominal qualification awarded to physicians who have completed the prescribed training requirements and membership examinations mandated by the Royal College of Psychiatrists. MRCPsych is awarded after the completion of core psychiatry training and successful completion of examinations[1]. A further three years within psychiatry and a certificate of completion of specialist training are required to register as a psychiatrist on the General Medical Council specialist register. [2] The examination has undergone a radical change in the past few years, notably in terms of focus and structure.

Composition

This meant that there were now three written exams and a Clinical Assessment of Skills & Competencies (CASC).[3] In order to obtain membership candidates currently need to complete 30 months post foundation/internship experience in Psychiatry and a pass in all components of the MRCPsych Examinations. [4] The current examination consists of 3 parts, with 2 written papers and a clinical exam (CASC). Paper A focuses on Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Psychology and theory, while Paper B focuses on Current Clinical Practice & Evidence within General Adult and the various subspecialties of Psychiatry, Epidemiology, Statistics, Critical Appraisal and Psychotherapy[5].

History

The qualification was first introduced in 1972 a year after the founding of the Royal College of Psychiatrists[6]. In recent years extensive modernisation has taken place in line with changes occurring in medical training in the UK. Major changes included the replacement of the classical long case method of assessment (where a single case is presented to the candidate, a history is taken and the case is presented to the examiners) with the objective structured clinical exam (OSCE) in 2003, and the subsequent replacement of the OSCE with the CASC exam in 2008. [3] A major factor for these changes has been the perceived reliability of the assessments. The long case assessments were criticised for their inter-test reliability with a study showing the reproducibility coefficient was as low as 0.24[7]. However, some psychiatrists were disappointed that loss of the long case method of assessment may be a detriment to future candidates ability to take an effective clinical history[8].

gollark: You should obviously immediately stop going out with them.
gollark: Surely you could just leave with this person.
gollark: ↓ you
gollark: With Dan, not you.
gollark: I agree.

References
  1. "Child and adolescent psychiatry curriculum". www.gmc-uk.org. Retrieved 2020-07-18.
  2. "Certificate of completion of training application". www.gmc-uk.org. Retrieved 2020-07-18.
  3. "3 years on: Examiners' and candidates' views on the CASC (Clinical Assessment of Skills and Competencies) | British Journal of Medical Practitioners". www.bjmp.org. Retrieved 2020-07-18.
  4. "Can I take an exam | Royal College of Psychiatrists". Royal College of Psychiatrists. Retrieved 2020-07-18.
  5. "Preparing for exams | Royal College of Psychiatrists". Royal College of Psychiatrists. Retrieved 2020-07-18.
  6. Tyrer, Stephen; Oyebode, Femi (March 2004). "Why does the MRCPsych examination need to change?". The British Journal of Psychiatry. 184 (3): 197–199. doi:10.1192/bjp.184.3.197. ISSN 0007-1250.
  7. Tyrer, Stephen (December 2007). "Non mors praematura: Commentary on … the long case is dead". Psychiatric Bulletin. 31 (12): 447–449. doi:10.1192/pb.bp.107.016386. ISSN 0955-6036.
  8. Benning, Tony; Broadhurst, Mark (December 2007). "The long case is dead – long live the long case: Loss of the MRCPsych long case and holism in psychiatry". Psychiatric Bulletin. 31 (12): 441–442. doi:10.1192/pb.bp.107.014951. ISSN 0955-6036.

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.