Lude (stream)

The Lude is an 7.0-kilometre (4.3 mi) long stream of Saxony-Anhalt, in the Harz Mountains of central Germany. It is the strongest and – besides an affluent of itself – longest headwater of the Thyra and therefore hydrographically defined as its upper course.

Lude
Location
LocationLower Harz, Saxony-Anhalt,  Germany
Physical characteristics
Source 
  location6 kilometres (4 mi) west of Breitenstein
  coordinates51°37′27″N 10°58′47″E
Mouth 
  location
in Stolberg into the Thyra
  coordinates
51°35′03″N 10°56′05″E
Basin features
ProgressionThyraHelmeUnstrutSaaleElbeNorth Sea
LandmarksSmall towns: Stolberg
Tributaries 
  rightKlippenwasser, Hellbach

Course

The Lude rises northwest of Stolberg, about one kilometre west of Breitenstein. Only about 400 metres (1,300 ft) separates the southern source stream of the Katzsohlbach from the sources of the Lude and about 600 metres (2,000 ft) from the source of the Wahnborn. From 1745 to 1910 the Rieschengraben ditch channelled water from the Lude and Schmale Lude into the Lower Harz Pond and Ditch System, where the water of the Lude was impounded by the reservoir Möllerteich. At the foot of the Lindischberg (orographic right) and Kießlingskopf (orographic left) hills the Klippenwasser empties into the upper Lude. Only 500 metres (1,600 ft) downstream the Hellbach joins from the right. Just 500 metres further downstream the Lude has another, right-hand tributary. The stream is considerably longer than the Hellbach, has a significantly greater catchment area, its own tributaries and is impounded in its lower reaches. The name of this stream is not known.

The Thyra is formed by the confluence of the three mountain streams of the Lude, Kleine Wilde and Große Wilde (whose upper three thirds are called the Schmale Lude = "Narrow Lude") in the old town area of Stolberg.[1] The Thyra then continues through Stolberg flowing in a southerly direction.

gollark: A 17x17 grid is small enough that you can probably get away with inefficiency, ubq.
gollark: I see.
gollark: Oops too many newlines.
gollark: Quoted from my notes:The relevant factors for course choice are probably something like this, vaguely in order: “personal fit” - how much I'll actually like it. This is quite hard to tell in advance. During the Y11 careers interview I was recommended some kind of trial thing for engineering, but I doubt that's on now, like many other things. Probably more important than other things, as I'd spend 3-5 years on said course, will perform better if I do enjoy it, and will probably not get much use out of studying a subject I would not like enough to do work related to. flexibility/generality - what options are opened by studying this stuff? Especially important in a changing and unpredictable world. how hard a subject is to learn out of university - relates to necessity of feedback from people who know it much better, specialized equipment needed, availability of good teaching resources, etc. Likely to decline over time due to the internet/modern information exchange systems and advancing technology making relevant equipment cheaper. earning potential - how much money does studying this bring? I don't think this is massively significant, it's probably outweighed by other things quite rapidly, but something to consider. Apparently high for quantitative and applied subjects. entry requirements - how likely I am to be able to study it. There are some things I probably cannot do at all now, such as medicine, but I didn't and don't really care about those, and there shouldn't be many. Most of the high-requirement stuff is seemingly available with more practical ones at less prestigious universities, which is probably fine.
gollark: Replying to https://discord.com/channels/346530916832903169/348702212110680064/759121895022002206Well, yes, somewhat, BUT! There are other considerations™.

See also

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.