Lucius Valerius Potitus (consul 449 BC)

Lucius Valerius Potitus was a patrician who, together with Marcus Horatius Barbatus, opposed the second decemvirate in 449 BC when that body showed despotic tendencies. In honor of their efforts, the pair were elected consuls for the remainder of that year.

Lucius Valerius Potitus
Consul of the Roman Republic
In office
13 December 449 BC – 12 December 448 BC [1]
Preceded bySecond College of Decemvirs
Succeeded byLars Herminius Aquilinus, Titus Verginius Tricostus Caeliomontanus
Personal details
BornUnknown
Ancient Rome
DiedUnknown
Ancient Rome

Potitus and the Decemvirate

The two men were patricians who stood up when a plebeian was being abused by the despotic second decemvirate, spoke critically of the decemviri and showed sympathy towards the plebeians. When the plebeians rebelled in the second plebeian secession they were chosen as negotiators because their previous actions had put them in a favourable light in the eyes of the plebeians, who felt that they were trustworthy.[2] When the demands of the plebeians were met and the secession was called off, both men were elected as consuls.[3] They passed the Valerio-Horatian Laws (Leges Veleriae-Horatiae). The first law established that the resolutions (plebiscites) of the Plebeian Council were binding on whole people, including the patricians. The second law restored the right of appeal to the people which had been suspended during the two decemvirates and added the provision that no official exempt from the right of appeal was to be appointed and in the case of such an appointment anyone could lawfully kill him. The third law put the principle of the inviolability (sacrosanctity) of the plebeian tribunes (the representatives of the plebeians) into the statutes.[4] Previously, this principle was only enshrined in the religious sanction of the lex sacrata.

Both the story of the first and the second decemvirates have been questioned by some modern historians who think that the second decemvirate was a fiction.[5][6][7] This would put into question the historicity of the second plebeian secession, the consulship of Lucius Valerius and his colleague and the Valerio-Horatian Laws. Mommsen and Cornell are among the historians who defend the historicity of at least the core of the story.[8][9] The Valerio-Horatian Laws have also been questioned. Regarding the law on the right of appeal, there were two other such laws by consuls from the Valeria family (dated 509 BC and 300 BC) and the argument is that only the last one is historical. Regarding the law of the resolution of the Plebeian Council, there were two other laws with the same provision, the Lex Publilia of 339 BC and the Lex Hortensia of 287 BC. Again, it is argued that only the last law is historical.[10][11][12][13][14] Other historians have defended the historicity of these laws.[15][16]

Quaestorship

Three years after his consulship, in 446 BC, Valerius was elected Quaestor together with Mamercus Aemilius Mamercinus. They were, according to Tacitus, the first elected quaestors of the Republic.[17][18]

gollark: Apparently whoever is doing the projectile thing is making a simple vaguely coilgun-type thing. I have no idea if it will actually work as they explained it.
gollark: Does it doing combustion count as *on* fire?
gollark: There would be significant legal issues and also quite likely damage to the box.
gollark: Maybe you would be better off using quantum field theory. Except that doesn't have gravity/general relativity, only special relativity, so you should work out how to unify those?
gollark: We can just say in the technical and artistic merit video that "the robot's projectile trajectory handling maths has relativistic corrections in it and would thus be equipped to fire projectiles near the speed of light, if we actually needed that, had a way to accelerate things that fast, could do so without destroying everything, did not have interactions with the air to worry about, and could safely ignore quantum effects".

References
  1. Robert Maxwell Ogilvie, Commentary on Livy, books 1–5, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1965, pp. 404, 405.
  2. Livy, Ab Urbe Condita, 3.49-50
  3. Livy, 3.53-54
  4. Livy, 3.55
  5. Beloch, Romische Geschichte bis zum Beginn der punischen Kriege, 1896, p. 326
  6. Drummond A, Cambridge Ancient History, VII.2 1989, pp. 113-142
  7. Forsythe, G., A Critical History of Early Rome, pp. 223-324
  8. Mommsen, Romische Forschungen, I (1864), pp.285-318
  9. Cornell, T.J., The Beginnings of Rome, pp. 273-275
  10. Pais, E. Storia crtica di Roma, II (1913), p. 465
  11. De Sanctis, G., Storia dei Romani, II (1960), pp. 49-50
  12. Staveley, E. S, Historia (1955), p. 412-14
  13. Ogilvie, R.M., A Commentary on Livy, (1965) p. 252
  14. Drummond A, Cambridge Ancient History, VII.2 1989, p. 223, 312
  15. Cornell, T. J., The Beginnings of Rome, pp. 277-278
  16. Santalucia, B., in Momigliano and Schiavone (eds), Storia di Roma (1988), p. 437
  17. Tacitus, Annals, xi. 22
  18. Broughton, vol i, pp.51
Political offices
Preceded by
Decemviri		 Consul of the Roman Republic
449 BC
with Marcus Horatius Barbatus		 Succeeded by
Lars Herminius Aquilinus,
and Titus Verginius Tricostus Caeliomontanus
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.