Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca

Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca (1899–1987) was a Belgian academic and longtime co-worker of the philosopher Chaïm Perelman. She volunteered in 1948 to support his work[1] and developed several aspects of the New Rhetoric independently in later years.

Life and work

Olbrechts-Tyteca was born into an important family of Brussels in 1899 and studied several humanities and social scientific methods at the University of Brussels without seeking a career.[2] She married the statistician Raymond Olbrechts, eleven years older than herself, and lived an academical and social quiet life until she met Perelman in 1948.

Olbrechts-Tyteca and Perelman worked together between 1948 and 1984. During this time they worked out an influential contribution to argumentation theory. Their opus magnum Traité de l'argumentation : La nouvelle rhétorique. led – together with a book of Toulmin, published in the same year – to the end of argumentative Logicism.[3] The concrete contribution of Olbrechts-Tyteca to this and the other joined works is disputed among scholars but prevailing opinion is that she contributed the vast illustrative part, while Perelman outlined the abstract-theoretical aspects.[4]
The Belgian academic established herself as an independent scholar with a work on rhetoric and comics, Le Comique du Discours, in 1974.[5]

Work
  • with Chaïm Perelman: Rhétorique et philosophie. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1952.
  • with Chaïm Perelman: Traité de l'argumentation : La nouvelle rhétorique. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1958. English: The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. (J. Wilkinson and P. Weaver, Trans.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Le Comique du Discours, Brussels Press, 1974.

Literature
  • Barbara Warnick: Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca's Contribution to The New Rhetoric in: Molly Meijer Wertheimer (Ed.): Listening to Their Voices: The Rhetorical Activities of Historical Woman. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1997; pp. 69–85.
  • Noemi Mattis-Perelman: Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca: A Personal Recollection. Letter to Ray D. Dearin, August, 11. 1994. See. Gross/Dearin: Chaim Perelman, 2003; p. 153.
  • David A. Frank; Michelle Bolduc: Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca's New Rhetoric in Quarterly Journal of Speech, Vol. 96 No. 2, 2010, pp. 141 – 163.
gollark: Christians don't agree on it.
gollark: There's some weird "trinity" thing.
gollark: I just don't see ads. I don't see why you would want to.
gollark: Ah yes, it does say that it needs 5. No idea what the threshold would be before people do anything.
gollark: And nobody is going to globally implement ridiculous filtering things.

References
  1. Alan G. Gross, Ray D. Dearin: Chaim Perelman. SUNY Press, 2003, p. 6.
  2. Alan G. Gross, Ray D. Dearin: Chaim Perelman. SUNY Press, 2003, p. 6.
  3. Harald Wohlrapp: Argumentative Geltung in Wohlrapp (Ed.): Wege der Argumentationsforschung, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, 1995; p. 282.
  4. David A. Frank; Michelle Bolduc: Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca's New Rhetoric in Quarterly Journal of Speech, Vol. 96 No. 2, 2010, pp. 141–142.
  5. David A. Frank; Michelle Bolduc: Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca's New Rhetoric in Quarterly Journal of Speech, Vol. 96 No. 2, 2010, p. 160.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.