Lords of Creation

Lords of Creation is a science fiction novel by American author Eando Binder (combined pseudonym for American brothers Earl and Otto Binder). It was first published in book form in 1949 by Prime Press in an edition of 2,112 copies, of which 112 were signed, numbered and slipcased. The novel was originally serialized in six parts in the magazine Argosy beginning September 23, 1939.

Lords of Creation
Dust-jacket from the first edition
AuthorEando Binder
Cover artistS. Levin
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
GenreScience fiction
PublisherPrime Press
Publication date
1949
Media typePrint (hardback)
Pages232
OCLC2562158

Plot summary

Homer Ellory awakes in the year 5000 AD after sleeping for 3,000 years and discovers the Earth in a state of barbarism. He befriends the people of North America who have been conquered by the Antarkans. Ellory leads a revolt and is captured by the Antarkans. Imprisoned in the Antarkan city of Lillamra and under sentence of death, the Lady Ermaine falls in love with him and enables his escape. He returns to North America where he leads a second revolt. After the surrender of Antarka, he is proclaimed the leader of the Earth's peoples.

Sources

  • Lords of Creation title listing at the Internet Speculative Fiction Database
  • Chalker, Jack L.; Mark Owings (1998). The Science-Fantasy Publishers: A Bibliographic History, 1923-1998. Westminster, MD and Baltimore: Mirage Press, Ltd. p. 531.
  • Crawford, Jr., Joseph H.; James J. Donahue; Donald M. Grant (1953). "333", A Bibliography of the Science-Fantasy Novel. Providence, RI: The Grandon Company. p. 12. OCLC 3924496.
  • Tuck, Donald H. (1974). The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction and Fantasy. Chicago: Advent. p. 46. ISBN 0-911682-20-1.
gollark: Strict reporting requirements would make running some things very impractical, so close enough.
gollark: https://bitcoinmagazine.com/business/us-infrastructure-bill-bitcoin-miners-coders-exempt is the first search result I found.
gollark: Doesn't the US already have some law in the pipeline which would basically make providing Bitcoiny services illegal/impossible?
gollark: Consequentialist-ly speaking, since it appears that political trends are moving in the *opposite* direction from not abusing this kind of technology, there may not be a better way.
gollark: This seems like one of those... noncentral things, where it's possibly technically accurate but brings inaccurate connotations from the words.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.