Logan plot

A Logan plot (or Logan graphical analysis)[1] is a graphical analysis technique based on the compartment model that uses linear regression to analyze pharmacokinetics of tracers involving reversible uptake. It is mainly used for the evaluation of nuclear medicine imaging data after the injection of a labeled ligand that binds reversibly to specific receptor or enzyme.

In conventional compartmental analysis, an iterative method is used to fit the individual model parameters in the solution of a compartmental model of specific configuration to the measurements with a measured plasma time-activity curve that serves as an forcing (input) function, and the binding of the tracer can then be described. Graphical analysis is a simplified method that transforms the model equations into a linear equation evaluated at multiple time points and provides fewer parameters (i.e., slope and intercept). Although the slope and the intercept can be interpreted in terms of a combination of model parameters if a compartmental model configuration is assumed, the graphical methods are independent of any specific model configuration. In case of irreversible tracers, certain fraction of the radioactivity is trapped in the tissue or the binding site during the course of the experiment, whereas reversible tracers show uptake and loss from all compartments throughout the study. The theoretical foundation of graphical analysis for irreversible tracers (also called Patlak graphical analysis or Patlak plot) was laid by Clifford Patlak and his colleagues[2][3] at NIH. Based on the original work of Patlak, Jean Logan and her colleagues[1] from Brookhaven National Laboratory extended the method to tracers with reversible kinetics.

Description

The kinetics of radiolabeled compounds in a compartmental system can be described in terms of a set of first-order, constant-coefficient, ordinary differential equations.[4][5] The time course of the activity in the multicompartmental system driven by a metabolite-corrected plasma input function ${\displaystyle C_{p}(t)}$ can be described by:

${\displaystyle {\frac {d\mathbf {A} }{dt}}=\mathbf {KA} +\mathbf {Q} C_{p}(t)}$

where ${\displaystyle \mathbf {A} }$ is a column vector of activity concentration for each compartment at time ${\displaystyle t}$, ${\displaystyle \mathbf {K} }$ is the matrix of the transfer constants between compartments, and ${\displaystyle \mathbf {Q} }$ is the vector of plasma-to-tissue transfer constants. Patlak and Blasberg[3] showed that the above equation can be written as:

${\displaystyle \int _{0}^{t}A(\tau )\,d\tau =-\mathbf {U} _{n}^{T}\mathbf {K} ^{-1}\mathbf {Q} \int _{0}^{t}C_{p}(\tau )\,d\tau +\mathbf {U} _{n}^{T}\mathbf {K} ^{-1}\mathbf {A} }$

where ${\displaystyle \mathbf {U} _{n}^{T}}$ represents a row vector of 1s and ${\displaystyle A(t)=\mathbf {U} _{n}^{T}\mathbf {A} }$. The total activity in the region of interest, ${\displaystyle \mathrm {ROI} (t)}$, is a combination of radioactivities from all compartments plus a plasma volume fraction (${\displaystyle V_{p}}$)[2] and thus:

${\displaystyle \int _{0}^{t}\mathrm {ROI} (\tau )\,d\tau =(-\mathbf {U} _{n}^{T}\mathbf {K} ^{-1}\mathbf {Q} +V_{p})\int _{0}^{t}C_{p}(\tau )\,d\tau +\mathbf {U} _{n}^{T}\mathbf {K} ^{-1}\mathbf {A} }$

By dividing both sides by ${\displaystyle \mathrm {ROI} (t)}$, one obtains the following linear equation:

${\displaystyle {{\int _{0}^{t}\mathrm {ROI} (\tau )\,d\tau } \over \mathrm {ROI} (t)}=(-\mathbf {U} _{n}^{T}\mathbf {K} ^{-1}\mathbf {Q} +V_{p}){{\int _{0}^{t}C_{p}(\tau )\,d\tau } \over \mathrm {ROI} (t)}+{{\mathbf {U} _{n}^{T}\mathbf {K} ^{-1}\mathbf {A} } \over {\mathbf {U} _{n}^{T}\mathbf {A} +V_{p}C_{p}}}}$

For ${\displaystyle t>t'}$, Patlak and his colleagues[2] showed that ${\displaystyle \mathbf {A} =-\mathbf {K} ^{-1}\mathbf {Q} C_{p}(t)}$, i.e., the steady-state condition. When this condition is satisfied, the intercept has reached its constant value so that after some time a plot of ${\displaystyle {{\int _{0}^{t}C_{p}(\tau )d\tau } \over \mathrm {ROI} (t)}}$ versus ${\displaystyle {{\int _{0}^{t}\mathrm {ROI} (\tau )d\tau } \over \mathrm {ROI} (t)}}$ becomes a straight line with slope ${\displaystyle (-\mathbf {U} _{n}^{T}\mathbf {K} ^{-1}\mathbf {Q} +V_{p})}$ and intercept ${\displaystyle {{\mathbf {U} _{n}^{T}\mathbf {K} ^{-1}\mathbf {A} } \over {\mathbf {U} _{n}^{T}\mathbf {A} +V_{p}C_{p}}}}$.[1]

For a catenary two-tissue compartment model with transfer constants ${\displaystyle K_{1}}$ (forward transport from plasma to tissue), ${\displaystyle k_{2}}$ (reverse transport from tissue to plasma), ${\displaystyle k_{3}}$ (binding parameter proportional to ${\displaystyle B_{\max }k_{\mathrm {on} }}$), and ${\displaystyle k_{4}}$ (dissociation constant) to analyze enzyme or receptor system, the slope represents the total distribution volume (${\displaystyle V_{d}}$) and is given by ${\displaystyle {\frac {K_{1}}{k_{2}}}(1+{\frac {k_{3}}{k_{4}}})+V_{p}}$,[1] where ${\displaystyle k_{3}=B_{\max }k_{\mathrm {on} }}$, ${\displaystyle k_{4}=k_{\mathrm {off} }}$, ${\displaystyle {\frac {k_{3}}{k_{4}}}={\frac {B_{\max }}{K_{d}}}}$, and ${\displaystyle K_{d}=k_{\mathrm {off} }/k_{\mathrm {on} }}$, in which ${\displaystyle B_{\max }}$ is the concentration of ligand binding sites, ${\displaystyle K_{d}}$ is the equilibrium dissociation constant for the ligand-binding site complex, ${\displaystyle k_{\mathrm {on} }}$ is the ligand-binding association constant, ${\displaystyle k_{\mathrm {off} }}$ is the ligand-binding dissociation constant. For a one-tissue compartment model with transfer constants ${\displaystyle K_{1}}$ and ${\displaystyle k_{2}}$, the slope is ${\displaystyle \lambda +V_{p}}$, where ${\displaystyle \lambda }$ is the partition coefficient (${\displaystyle {K_{1}}/{k_{2}}}$) and the intercept is ${\displaystyle {\frac {-1}{k_{2}(1+V_{p}/\lambda )}}}$.[1]

See also

• Patlak plot
• Multi-compartment model
• Positron emission tomography
• Binding potential
• Distribution volume

References

1. J. Logan; J.S. Fowler; N.D. Volkow; A.P. Wolf; S.L. Dewey; D.J. Schlyer; R.R. MacGregor; R. Hitzemann; B. Bendriem; S.J. Gatley; D.R. Christman (September 1990). "Graphical analysis of reversible radioligand binding from time-activity measurements applied to [N-¹¹C-methyl]-(-)-cocaine PET studies in human subjects". Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 10 (5): 740–747. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.1990.127. PMID 2384545.
2. C.S. Patlak; R.G. Blasberg; J.D. Fenstermacher (March 1983). "Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data". Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 3 (1): 1–7. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.1983.1. PMID 6822610.
3. C.S. Patlak; R.G. Blasberg (April 1985). "Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data. Generalizations". Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 5 (4): 584–590. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.1985.87. PMID 4055928.
4. K. Godfrey (1983). Compartmental Models and Their Application. Academic Press, New York.
5. J.A. Jacquez (1985). Compartmental Analysis in Biology and Medicine (2nd ed.). The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.