Lloydminster (former Saskatchewan electoral district)
Lloydminster is a former provincial electoral district for the Legislative Assembly of the province of Saskatchewan, Canada. This constituency was created before the 2nd Saskatchewan general election in 1908. Abolished in 1934, the riding was incorporated into the district of Cut Knife.
This constituency was reconstituted for the 23rd Saskatchewan general election in 1995.
Members of the Legislative Assembly
# | MLA | Served | Party | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Henry Claud Lisle | 1908–1912 | Liberal | |
2. | John Percival Lyle | 1912–1917 | Liberal | |
3. | Robert James Gordon | 1917–1934 | Liberal |
Election results
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Henry Claud Lisle | 680 | 51.36% | – | |
Provincial Rights | Henry Robert Miles | 644 | 48.64% | – | |
Total | 1,324 | 100.00% |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | John Percival Lyle | 606 | 39.74% | -11.62 | |
Conservative | Oscar H. Price | 517 | 33.90% | -14.74 | |
Independent | Ambrose H. Longton | 402 | 26.36% | – | |
Total | 1,525 | 100.00% |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Robert James Gordon | 1,257 | 59.80% | +20.06 | |
Conservative | James A. Hill | 845 | 40.20% | +6.30 | |
Total | 2,102 | 100.00% |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Robert James Gordon | Acclaimed | 100.00% | ||
Total | Acclamation |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Robert James Gordon | 1,144 | 66.67% | - | |
Progressive | Robert M. Armstrong | 572 | 33.33% | – | |
Total | 1,716 | 100.00% |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ± | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liberal | Robert James Gordon | 1,510 | 43.62% | -23.05 | |
Progressive | William Albert Gardiner | 1,003 | 28.97% | -4.36 | |
Conservative | James Hetherington | 949 | 27.41% | - | |
Total | 3,462 | 100.00% |
gollark: <@!309787486278909952> I must also disagree with gollark.
gollark: OR MUST YOU?
gollark: They are different types. They just aren't consistently treated that way.
gollark: It will also, if you cause infinite recursion, cause out of memory instead of out of call stack errors.
gollark: <@!309787486278909952> Yes.
See also
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.