Livin' for the Weekend (Triumph album)

Livin' for the Weekend: The Anthology is a compilation album by the Canadian hard rock band Triumph. The most comprehensive Triumph anthology ever issued at the time of its 2005 release, this two-CD set draws material from most of the albums the band had issued, as well as adding a previously unreleased cover of "Love Hurts" and two tracks from their 1983 appearance at the US Festival that was its own release in 2003 called Live at the US Festival.

Livin' for the Weekend: The Anthology
Compilation album by
Triumph
ReleasedMay 10, 2005
Recorded2004-05
GenreRock
Length147:50
LabelCastle
ProducerEmmett, Levine, Moore
Triumph chronology
A Night of Triumph
(2004)		 Livin' for the Weekend: The Anthology
(2005)		 Extended Versions: Triumph
(2006)
Professional ratings
Review scores
SourceRating
AllMusic link

Tracks

Disc one
  1. "24 Hours a Day" – 4:25
  2. "Street Fighter" – 6:30
  3. "Blinding Light Show"/"Moonchild" – 8:41
  4. "Takes Time" – 3:47
  5. "Medley: New York City Streets, Pt. 1/ Pt. 2" – 7:51
  6. "Rocky Mountain Way" (Barnstorm cover) – 4:06
  7. "Lay It on the Line" – 4:04
  8. "Hold On" – 6:03
  9. "I Live for the Weekend" – 5:17
  10. "I Can Survive" – 3:59
  11. "Fool for Your Love" – 4:29
  12. "Allied Forces" – 5:05
  13. "Fight the Good Fight" – 6:30

Disc two
  1. "Magic Power" – 4:54
  2. "Too Much Thinking" – 5:38
  3. "When the Lights Go Down" – 5:05
  4. "Follow Your Heart" – 3:34
  5. "Spellbound [live]" – 3:57
  6. "Mind Games" – 4:47
  7. "Tears in the Rain" – 3:54
  8. "Somebody's Out There" – 4:05
  9. "Just One Night" – 3:40
  10. "Never Say Never" – 3:37
  11. "Headed for Nowhere" – 6:07
  12. "Carry on the Flame" – 5:15
  13. "Long Time Gone" – 5:14
  14. "Never Surrender [live]" – 6:38
  15. "Love Hurts" (The Everly Brothers cover) – 4:38

Personnel
gollark: You could get the same hard-to-brute-force-ness with, apparently, a 37 digit base 10 one.
gollark: It's basically just a convoluted way to express a 60-digit base-4 number.
gollark: The important thing is how much y increases each time x goes up by 1, which is the gradient.
gollark: I think so, yes. Generally I would take the equation (y = 3x + c) and substitute in one of the points' x and y values, but I guess for this that works.
gollark: You have the value when x = 1.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.