Lindeberg's condition

In probability theory, Lindeberg's condition is a sufficient condition (and under certain conditions also a necessary condition) for the central limit theorem (CLT) to hold for a sequence of independent random variables.[1][2][3] Unlike the classical CLT, which requires that the random variables in question have finite variance and be both independent and identically distributed, Lindeberg's CLT only requires that they have finite variance, satisfy Lindeberg's condition, and be independent. It is named after the Finnish mathematician Jarl Waldemar Lindeberg.[4]

Statement

Let be a probability space, and , be independent random variables defined on that space. Assume the expected values and variances exist and are finite. Also let

If this sequence of independent random variables satisfies Lindeberg's condition:

for all , where 1{…} is the indicator function, then the central limit theorem holds, i.e. the random variables

converge in distribution to a standard normal random variable as

Lindeberg's condition is sufficient, but not in general necessary (i.e. the inverse implication does not hold in general). However, if the sequence of independent random variables in question satisfies

then Lindeberg's condition is both sufficient and necessary, i.e. it holds if and only if the result of central limit theorem holds.

Remarks

Feller's theorem

Feller's theorem can be used as an alternative method to prove that Lindeberg's condition holds.[5] Letting and for simplicity , the theorem states

if , and converges weakly to a standard normal distribution as then satisfies the Lindeberg's condition.


This theorem can be used to disprove the central limit theorem holds for by using proof by contradiction. This procedure involves proving that Lindeberg's condition fails for .

Interpretation

Because the Lindeberg condition implies as , it guarantees that the contribution of any individual random variable () to the variance is arbitrarily small, for sufficiently large values of .

gollark: .....
gollark: Is that in *survival*?!
gollark: ¥E§
gollark: But if you have large amounts of a few items, bigger is better.
gollark: It is generally sort of, yes.

See also

References

  1. Billingsley, P. (1986). Probability and Measure (2nd ed.). Wiley. p. 369.
  2. Ash, R. B. (2000). Probability and measure theory (2nd ed.). p. 307.
  3. Resnick, S. I. (1999). A probability Path. p. 314.
  4. Lindeberg, J. W. (1922). "Eine neue Herleitung des Exponentialgesetzes in der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung". Mathematische Zeitschrift. 15 (1): 211–225. doi:10.1007/BF01494395.
  5. K. B. Athreya, S. N. Lahiri (2006), Measure Theory and Probability Theory. p. 348.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.