Limit point compact

In mathematics, a topological space X is said to be limit point compact[1] or weakly countably compact if every infinite subset of X has a limit point in X. This property generalizes a property of compact spaces. In a metric space, limit point compactness, compactness, and sequential compactness are all equivalent. For general topological spaces, however, these three notions of compactness are not equivalent.

Properties and examples

  • Limit point compactness is equivalent to countable compactness if X is a T1-space and is equivalent to compactness if X is a metric space.
  • An example of a space X that is not weakly countably compact is any countable (or larger) set with the discrete topology. A more interesting example is the countable complement topology.
  • Even though a continuous function from a compact space X, to an ordered set Y in the order topology, must be bounded, the same thing does not hold if X is limit point compact. An example is given by the space (where X = {1, 2} carries the indiscrete topology and is the set of all integers carrying the discrete topology) and the function given by projection onto the second coordinate. Clearly, ƒ is continuous and is limit point compact (in fact, every nonempty subset of has a limit point) but ƒ is not bounded, and in fact is not even limit point compact. is an example of limit point compact space that is not countably compact.
  • Every countably compact space (and hence every compact space) is weakly countably compact, but the converse is not true.
  • For metrizable spaces, compactness, limit point compactness, and sequential compactness are all equivalent.
  • The set of all real numbers, R, is not limit point compact; the integers are an infinite set but do not have a limit point in R.
  • If (X, T) and (X, T*) are topological spaces with T* finer than T and (X, T*) is limit point compact, then so is (X, T).
  • A finite space is vacuously limit point compact.
gollark: Haskell code is very confusing because of its crazy use of abstraction everywhere, somewhat alien (but nice and clean) syntax, and the whole lazy evaluation thing.
gollark: ```haskellprimes = filterPrime [2..] where filterPrime (p:xs) = p : filterPrime [x | x <- xs, x `mod` p /= 0]````primes` here has been defined as the infinite list of all prime numbers.
gollark: Learn Haskell.
gollark: No, there are better ways.
gollark: At least `npm` actually works reliably most of the time!

See also

Notes

  1. The terminology "limit point compact" appears in a topology textbook by James Munkres, and is apparently due to him. According to him, some call the property "Fréchet compactness", while others call it the "Bolzano-Weierstrass property". Munkres, p. 178179.

References

  • James Munkres (1999). Topology (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-181629-2.
  • This article incorporates material from Weakly countably compact on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.