Limerence (film)
Limerence is a 2012 Italian short film written, directed and starred by Giuseppe Rossi. It is about a psychological state called limerence, a term coined by the American psychologist Dorothy Tennov to describe the obsessive state of romantic love.
| Limerence | |
|---|---|
_poster.jpg) Film poster | |
| Directed by | Giuseppe Rossi |
| Produced by | Giuseppe Rossi |
| Starring | Giuseppe Rossi Alessia Gentile Giuseppe Sena |
| Music by | Alexandro Martone |
| Cinematography | Alessio Antoniello |
| Edited by | Giuseppe Rossi |
Release date |
|
Running time | 16 minutes |
| Country | Italy |
| Language | Italian |
Plot
A singer is reinventing jazz music, but after being dumped by his girlfriend loses the creative inspiration. To get back his lover he decides to fight in a musical duel against a rock guitarist who is now dating his ex-girlfriend.
Cast
- Giuseppe Rossi as Paolo
- Alessia Gentile as Claudia
- Giuseppe Sena as Flavio
- Maxim Di Leo as Claudia's brother
- Alessandro Giordano as Drummer
- Sveva Cicala as Journalist
- Andra Cassano as Assistant Journalist
gollark: But that is... absolutely not the case.
gollark: I mean, yes, if you already trust everyone to act sensibly and without doing bad stuff, then privacy doesn't matter for those reasons.
gollark: Oh, and as an extension to the third thing, if you already have some sort of vast surveillance apparatus, even if you trust the government of *now*, a worse government could come along and use it later for... totalitarian things.
gollark: For example:- the average person probably does *some* sort of illegal/shameful/bad/whatever stuff, and if some organization has information on that it can use it against people it wants to discredit (basically, information leads to power, so information asymmetry leads to power asymmetry). This can happen if you decide to be an activist or something much later, even- having lots of data on you means you can be manipulated more easily (see, partly, targeted advertising, except that actually seems to mostly be poorly targeted)- having a government be more effective at detecting minor crimes (which reduced privacy could allow for) might *not* actually be a good thing, as some crimes (drug use, I guess?) are kind of stupid and at least somewhat tolerable because they *can't* be entirely enforced practically
gollark: No, it probably isn't your fault, it must have been dropped from my brain stack while I was writing the rest.
References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.