Lexicalist hypothesis

Lexicalist hypothesis is a hypothesis, proposed by Noam Chomsky, in which he claims that syntactic transformations only can operate on syntactic constituents.[1] Lexicalist hypothesis is a response to generative semanticians who use transformations in the derivation of complex words.

There are two versions of lexicalist hypothesis: the weak version and the strong version. In weak version the transformations could not operate on the derivational words; and in strong version, the transformations could not operate on both derivational and inflectional words.

There are objections to the hypothesis such as distributed morphology.[2]

The Lexical Integrity Hypothesis is a subset of the Lexicalist Hypothesis.

Notes
  1. Chomsky (1970)
  2. Halle & Marantz (1993)
gollark: Also, the new user thing gives 500 errors, which is probably related.
gollark: It says my username/password is invalid.
gollark: Please fix Kitforum IMMEDIATELY. I CANNOT sign in.
gollark: Greetings.
gollark: Or at least my server does.

References
  • Chomsky, N. 1970. Remarks on Nominalization, in: Jacobs, R. and P. Rosenbaum (eds.) Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Blaisdell, Waltham, MA.
  • Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In H. K, & S. J. Keyser, The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honour of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 111-176). Cambridge: MIT Press.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.