Lexical grammar

In computer science, a lexical grammar is a formal grammar defining the syntax of tokens. The program is written using characters that are defined by the lexical structure of the language used. The character set is equivalent to the alphabet used by any written language. The lexical grammar lays down the rules governing how a character sequence is divided up into subsequences of characters, each part of which represents an individual token. This is frequently defined in terms of regular expressions.[1]

For instance, the lexical grammar for many programming languages specifies that a string literal starts with a " character and continues until a matching " is found (escaping makes this more complicated), that an identifier is an alphanumeric sequence (letters and digits, usually also allowing underscores, and disallowing initial digits), and that an integer literal is a sequence of digits. So in the following character sequence "abc" xyz1 23 the tokens are string, identifier and number (plus whitespace tokens) because the space character terminates the sequence of characters forming the identifier. Further, certain sequences are categorized as keywords – these generally have the same form as identifiers (usually alphabetical words), but are categorized separately; formally they have a different token type.[2]

Examples

Regular expressions for common lexical rules follow (for example, C).

Unescaped string literal (quote, followed by non-quotes, ending in a quote):

"[^"]*"

Escaped string literal (quote, followed by escaped characters or non-quotes, ending in a quote):

"(\.|[^\"])*"

Integer literal:

[0-9]+

Decimal integer literal (no leading zero):

[1-9][0-9]*|0

Hexadecimal integer literal:

0[Xx][0-9A-Fa-f]+

Octal integer literal:

0[0-7]+

Identifier:

[A-Za-z_$][A-Za-z0-9_$]*
gollark: No, Void Linux is actually perfect and flawless, your password is probably wrong.
gollark: I had that experience yesterday. It is best avoided.
gollark: Oh no, did you look at a PHP program?
gollark: And contains Nim's traditional thousand-line source files.
gollark: Huh, neat, the Nim forum is actually written in Nim.

See also

References
  1. Buyya (2009). Object-oriented Programming with Java: Essentials and Applications. Tata McGraw-Hill Education. pp. 57–. ISBN 978-0-07-066908-6.
  2. James Gosling (2000). The Java Language Specification. Addison-Wesley Professional. pp. 9–. ISBN 978-0-201-31008-5.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.