Lenawee County Board of Health v. Messerly

Lenawee County Board of Health v. Messerly, 331 N.W.2d 203 (1982) is a US contract law case decided by the Supreme Court of Michigan. It used a risk of loss analysis to justify the denial of rescission as a contract remedy despite the presence of mutual mistake.[1]

Facts

The Pickles bought a 600-square-foot (56 m2) three unit dwelling for use as a rental property from the Messerly's, only to discover that an illegal septic system had contaminated the ground. Pickles sought rescission and Messerly sought a deficiency judgment.

Judgment

The Supreme Court of Michigan backed away from the precedent of Sherwood v. Walker in favor of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts, and relied on an "as is" clause in the land contract to deny rescission.[2]

gollark: Emusolang™.
gollark: I'm an ageless entity from beyond space and time.
gollark: Anyone want to try my Linux test virus? It doesn't really have great cross-platform compatibility, and indeed may break if you happen to run it on a system different to what it was compiled on.
gollark: I used to infect osmarks.tk visitors with viruses as a Java applet.
gollark: Yes.

See also
  • US contract law

Notes
  1. Ayres, I. & Speidel, R.E. Studies in Contract Law, Seventh Edition. Foundation Press, New York, NY: 2008, p. 508
  2. Ayres, p. 508
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.