Leasehold Reform Act 1967

Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (c 88) is an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom, which concerns English land law and compulsory purchase. A government bill, the law remains largely intact. It was passed by both Houses and had been tabled by ministers of the Labour government, 1964–1970.

Contents

The Act grants the right to long leaseholders of houses let at low and moderately low rents to buy their homes compulsorily from their landlords at a fair price.

Initially the 1967 Act applied only to homes below these rateable values: £400 p.a. in London and £200 p.a. elsewhere (thus targeting low-to-middle income homeowners); the reform coincided with lower wages becoming less of a bar to access to loans from major mortgage lenders.

Amendments

The Act has been amended many times to expand these rights, to homeowners having higher rateable values.

Background

English law and lending eschews the concept of flying freehold entire properties, such as flats. The solution was to set up a standard model of any flat ownership based on landlord and tenant but which is not seen in much of Europe where a more commonhold system of ownership is common, as long-term flat owners wish to gain a greater than 'transient' or 'time-barred' interest in their home. Such long leases were already in use in housing, as before purpose-built apartments were built, an aristocratic or other large capitalist landlord could co-steer the successful, competitive development of their urban estates; these took the initial form of "building leases" then leases to allow the flexibility of the landlord deciding whether to create apartments, extensions, shorter-term lettings all of which liberties have been tempered by law or by secured lending codes to enhance the status of long-term lessees. The dozen or so private great collections of reversions continue the landlord-tenant relation with piecemeal reductions, across the Central London grander residential zones, in the leasehold valuation tribunals referred to as "Prime Central London".

gollark: Hey, I can be annoyed by companies doing evil things *and* dislike this too.
gollark: I consider it annoying political advertising (especially when that bug made it uncloseable) and don't like it.
gollark: > I think, ultimately, you're using their service so they can do what they like<@229987409977278464> They *can*, but I don't *want* them to in all cases.
gollark: It's not the first thing to pop up there, they mostly use it to notify me about updates and such (useful) and bother me about the desktop app (not useful!).
gollark: > Starting next week, we’ll begin to use our in-product screens and our blog to raise awareness of anti-racist causes and encourage you to take concrete action, such as calling on local officials to advocate for police reform.> in-product screens

See also

Notes

    References
    • K Gray and SF Gray, Land Law (7th edn 2011) Ch 11
    • K Gray and S Gray, ‘Private Property and Public Propriety’, in J McLean (ed), Property and the Constitution (Hart 1999) 36-7
    This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.