Laura Ruderman

Laura Ruderman is a former Washington State Representative for Washington's 45th legislative district. She is a member of the Democratic Party. Ruderman graduated from Wesleyan University in Middletown, Connecticut.[1]

Laura Ruderman
Member of the Washington House of Representatives
from the 45th district
In office
1999–2005

Early legislative work

Laura Ruderman represented the 45th Legislative District in Washington State from 1999 to 2005.[2][3]

While in office, Ruderman was vice-chair of the Technology, Telecommunications, and Energy Committee,[4] and served on the Health Care, Appropriations, and Rules Committees. In addition to these assignments, she was a member of the K-20 Education Network, the Information Services Board, and the Governor's Task Force on Virtual Learning.[5] Ruderman was elected by her colleagues to be the vice-chair of the House Democratic Caucus.

Ruderman was named one of "100 to Watch" by the Democratic Leadership Council, 2003[6]

Laura Ruderman did not seek re-election in 2004, running instead for Washington State Secretary of State against incumbent Republican Sam Reed;[2][7] she captured 45% of the vote to Sam Reed's 51%.[8]

Current activities

Since 2005 Ruderman has worked as a school and community activist and a businesswoman.[9]

She is or has been active in the following organizations:

  • RESULTS, a nonprofit organization dedicated to improving the lives of impoverished families through legislative action
  • Washington Community Alliance for Self-Help (CASH), a non-profit organization that provides low-income women with credit, business training, and peer support
  • K-20 Educational Network
  • Digital Learning Commons[5]
  • King County Library System Foundation[10]
  • Sound Mental Health[11]
  • 21 Acres

Ruderman has been a member of the Redmond Chapter of Business and Professional Women, and is a current co-chair at Discovery Community School in the Lake Washington School District.[12][13]

2012 congressional candidacy

As of September 2011 Ruderman is running for Congress in Washington's 1st congressional district for 2012.[2][9] A June 2011 letter to her supporters says, in part:

... Starting today, I am taking on a new challenge: I am running for a seat in the United States Congress from Washington State in 2012. I am running to serve as a common-sense, effective voice for suburban families like yours and mine, and to help fix the outrageous mess in Washington, DC. I would be proud to be the next Democratic Representative from Washington State in Congress.[9]

gollark: > > There's also a few snippets of code on the Android version that allows for the downloading of a remote zip file, unzipping it, and executing said binary> so here's the thing, TikTok as an app, continuously downloads files i.e video files, it's kinda the whole point. there's nothing "odd" about being able to download and extract zip files, the odd thing is delivering executables via zip. however, this is a non-issue and honestly a red herring, why?This is irrelevant. Yes, downloading video files is normal, downloading extra code which might be doing whatever (subject to sandboxing, at least) is not.
gollark: It could record locally and upload later, though.
gollark: This person apparently reverse-engineered it statically, not at runtime, but it *can* probably detect if you're trying to reverse-engineer it a bit while running.
gollark: > > App behavior changes slightly if they know you're trying to figure out what they're doing> this sentence makes no sense to me, "if they know"? he's dissecting the code as per his own statement, thus looking at rows of text in various format. the app isn't running - so how can it change? does the app have self-awareness? this sounds like something out of a bad sci-fi movie from the 90's.It's totally possible for applications to detect and resist being debugged a bit.
gollark: > this is standard programming dogma, detailed logging takes a lot of space and typically you enable logging on the fly on clients to catch errors. this is literally cookie cutter "how to build apps 101", and not scary. or, phrased differently, is it scary if all of that logging was always on? obviously not as it's agreed upon and detailed in TikTok's privacy policy (really), so why is it scary that there's an on and off switch?This is them saying that remotely configurable logging is fine and normal; I don't think them being able to arbitrarily gather more data is good.

References
  1. Wesleyan University graduation, Wesconnect News, October 22, 2011
  2. Laura Ruderman Running In Washington Roll Call June 2011
  3. State Representative 1999-2004 The News Tribune
  4. An Innovator In The Digital Marketplace The Seattle Times
  5. Activities as a WA State Representative LearningCommons.org
  6. Named one of "100 to Watch" by the Democratic Leadership Council 2003 DLC.org
  7. Legislator hopes to oust secretary of state The Seattle Times
  8. Official election result 2004 Archived 2010-10-27 at the Wayback Machine vote.wa.gov
  9. June 1 blog News Tribune
  10. KCLS Foundation Annual Report 2004 Archived 2012-07-22 at the Wayback Machine kcls.org
  11. Sound Mental Health 2007 Annual Report smh.org
  12. DCS Community Minutes April 2010 lwsd.org
  13. Community Group of Discovery Community School 2011 14thstory.com
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.