Lampleigh v Brathwait

Lampleigh v Braithwait [1615] EWHC KB J 17, (1615) Hobart 105, 80 ER 255 is a case on implied assumpsit and past consideration in English contract law.

Facts

Braithwait killed a man called Patrick Mahume unlawfully. He asked Lampleigh to ride to the King and petition for a pardon. Lampleigh was successful and, delighted, Braithwait promised £100 to Lampleigh; but he never paid up and Lampleigh sued. Braithwait said that because the service had been performed in the past, there was no good consideration at the time for the promise, regardless of the fact that Lampleigh was successful in securing a pardon.

Judgment

The Court of the King's Bench held that there was an implied understanding (i.e. implied assumpsit, or "assumption" of obligation) that a fee would be paid. Where a past benefit was conferred at the beneficiary's request, and where a reward would reasonably be expected, the promisor would be bound by his promise.

Significance

In later centuries, judges have pondered some unsettled issues arising from this case. What if the promised £100 was insufficient? What if nothing was promised; would quantum meruit be available?[1]

gollark: <@702965602100183080> learn "apioform"
gollark: <@702965602100183080> what is the meaning of "apioform"
gollark: Just as planned.
gollark: I should contribute to ubqgh0wikioid.
gollark: Oh, fun idea, an app which applies geotags to any picture on your phone ever, retroactively, whenever you go to a new location.

References
  1. Case ref to follow shortly!

See also
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.