Kirksey v. Kirksey

Kirksey v. Kirksey, Ala. Sup. 8 Ala. 131 (1845), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of Alabama that held that a promise by a man to give his sister-in-law a house if she would move to his land was not a valid contract because it lacked bargained-for-consideration.[1]

Decision

After learning of the death of his brother (the plaintiff's husband), the defendant sent the plaintiff a letter inquiring about her situation. He said that he would like for her to move to his farm (some 60 miles away) if she had not yet acquired a pre-emption right on her open land. The defendant promised to give the plaintiff a place to stay if she moved. She moved to the defendant's farm, but the defendant kicked her out after two years, forcing her to live in a dilapidated house in the woods. The plaintiff sued to enforce the promise, but the court did not find a valid contract. It held that a promise on the condition, "If you will come down and see me" is not a bargained for exchange for the promisee's "coming down to see" the promisor. The promise is not sufficiently supported by bargained-for consideration and is not enforceable.[2]

gollark: Really? Oops.
gollark: Sufficiently general pattern matching is rather hard, so it cannot differentiate palaiologes.
gollark: osmarkscalculator™ can't really do those.
gollark: The derivative of LyricLy with respect to x is W(gcd(x, 4)), using my new continuous gcd function.
gollark: <@332271551481118732> YOU should become LyricLy, destroyer of worlds.

References
  1. Ayres, I., and Speidel, R.E. Studies in Contract Law, Seventh Edition. Foundation Press, New York, NY: 2008, p. 32
  2. Ayres, p. 32
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.