Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United States
Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United States, 579 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Department of Veterans Affairs must apply the "Rule of Two" when considering and awarding contracts under the Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006.
| Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United States | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued February 22, 2016 Decided June 16, 2016 | |
| Full case name | Kingdomware Technologies, Inc., Petitioner v. United States |
| Docket no. | 14–916 |
| Citations | 579 U.S. ___ (more) 136 S. Ct. 1969; 195 L. Ed. 2d 334 |
| Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
| Case history | |
| Prior | 754 F.3d 923 (Fed. Cir. 2014) |
| Holding | |
| The Department of Veterans Affairs must apply the "Rule of Two" when considering and awarding contracts under the Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006. The rule is mandatory, not discretionary, regardless of whether the rule is being used to meet annual minimum contracting goals. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Thomas, joined by unanimous |
| Laws applied | |
| Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006 | |
By containing the word "shall" the rule becomes mandatory, not discretionary, regardless of whether the rule is being used to meet annual minimum contracting goals.[1][2]
Opinion of the Court
Associate Justice Clarence Thomas authored a unanimous opinion.[2]
gollark: It would be like something which electrocutes you whenever you make a compile error. You don't want to make compile errors in the first place, and making them worse is not very helpful.
gollark: If you have some accident and get injured horribly, you probably won't *learn* much, just... get horribly injured, you don't want the accident anyway.
gollark: And if there was a convenient not-too-bad way to reduce injuries with knives, they would probably be used. I imagine chefs have something.
gollark: Yes, but it's harder.
gollark: Not really.
References
- SCOTUSblog coverage
- Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United States, No. 14–916, 579 U.S. ____ (2016).
External links
- Text of Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. United States, 579 U.S. ___ (2016) is available from: Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion)
- SCOTUSblog coverage
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.