Kievskaya starina

Kievskaya starina (Russian: Киевская старина, literally means Kievan Past) was a historically ethographic and literal chronicle (monthly magazine). It was published in Kiev in Russian language and Ukrainian language during 1882-1907.

Kievan Past
TypeMonthly
FormatBroadsheet
Editor-in-chiefFeofan Lebedintsev (founder)
Founded1 February 1882
Political alignmentHistorically ethographic and literal chronicles
LanguageRussian, Ukrainian
Ceased publication1907
HeadquartersKiev
CirculationKiev city
Celebration of the Kievskaya starina 15th anniversary, 1898; sitting Zhytetsky, Lazarevskyi, Tarnovskyi, Chalyi, Shuhurov, Antonovych, Mykhalchuk, A.Storozhenko, Shcherbyna; standing Kivlytskyi, Vasylenko, Stepovych, Molchanovskyi, Levytskyi, M.Storozhenko, Miakotin
Ukrayina magazine, 1907

In the last year of its existence when censorship on Ukrainian language was dropped, the periodical was renamed Ukraine and was published in Ukrainian. The monthly chronicle played a major role in development of Ukrainian culture under the conditions of the Russian Empire. Together with the periodical worked such people as Volodymyr Antonovych, Dmytro Bahaliy, Mykola Kostomarov, Pavlo Zhytetskyi, Orest Levytskyi, Oleksandr Yefymenko, Oleksandr Lazarevskyi etc.

Main sponsor of the magazine was Hryhoriy Galagan.

Along with the magazine, in 1899 Mykola Biliashivsky started to publish his "Arkheologicheskaya letopis Yuzhnoi Rossii" (Archaeological chronicle of the Southern Russia) at first as an addition, but in 1901-1905 as a separate magazine.

After Kievaskaya starina ceased to be published, in 1907 Naumenko continued to publish monthly magazine under name Ukrayina for year.

In the late Soviet period attempts were made to revive the magazine in 1970s, but only since 1992 Petro Tolochko managed to establish a magazine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyivska starovyna which is published in Ukrainian language.

Chief editors
  • Lebedintsev
  • Lashkevych
  • Naumenko
gollark: https://www.jtolio.com/2016/03/go-channels-are-bad-and-you-should-feel-bad/
gollark: Nope.
gollark: Yes, and overuse of channels bad as they are just not very good a lot of the time.
gollark: Ugh, Go code is just so awful to work on, especially this.
gollark: I think I can make this work sensibly if it just used *callbacks*, as it *obviously should have*, but that would require me to know how to do those in Go.

References
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.