Kenneth Diplock, Baron Diplock
William John Kenneth Diplock, Baron Diplock, PC (8 December 1907 – 14 October 1985[1]) was a British judge and successively a Justice of the High Court in England and Wales and a Lord Justice of Appeal before being created a Law Lord.[2]
Early life
Born the son of an Irish solicitor, he attended Whitgift School in Croydon,Surrey and University College, Oxford, where he read chemistry and was later to become an Honorary Fellow.[3] His father was Herbert Diplock and his mother was Christine Brooke.
Career
Diplock was called to the Bar by the Middle Temple in 1932 and made a King's Counsel (KC) in 1948. In 1956, he was appointed successively to the High Court.[3]and the Court of Appeal.
He became a Lord of Appeal in Ordinary (Law Lord) on 30 September 1968[1] and was elevated as a life peer with the title Baron Diplock, of Wansford in the County of Huntingdon and Peterborough to the House of Lords.[4][5]
As Lord Diplock, he chaired a commission set up in 1972 to consider legal measures against terrorism in Northern Ireland, which led to the establishment of the juryless Diplock courts with which his name is now associated.
At the time of his death, Lord Diplock was the longest serving Law Lord.[1]
Contributions to legal thought
He made many contributions to legal thought and pushed the law in new and unique directions, not least UK courts without juries ('Diplock courts)'.[6]
The current typology of grounds for judicial review is owing to Lord Diplock.
- Procedural impropriety[7]
- Nemo judex (Bias rule)[8]
- Audi alteram partem (Hearing rule)[9]
- Illegality[10]
- Ultra vires
- Simple ultra vires
- Extended ultra vires
- Procedural ultra vires
- Fettering
- Irrationality[10]
- Wednesbury irrationality
- Lack of proportionality
- Innominate Terms[11]
- Primary and Secondary Obligations[12]
Notable judgments
- Hong Kong Fir Shipping Co Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd [1962] 2 QB 26[3]
- Harvela Investments Ltd v Royal Trust of Canada (CI) Ltd [1986] AC 207[3]
- Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1985] AC 374
- Whitehouse v Lemon; Whitehouse v Gay News Ltd [1979] 2 WLR 281
- O'Reilly v Mackman [1983] 2 AC 237
- American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd [1975] A.C.396 HL
- Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith Ltd (1982)
See also
- Judicial review in English law
- Air New Zealand Flight 901
References
- Dickson, Brice (1989). "The Contribution of Lord Diplock to the General Law of Contract". Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 9 (4): 441. doi:10.1093/ojls/9.4.441.
- Hansard: 7th October 1968
- Andrews, Neil (2011). Contract Law. Cambridge University Press. p. 681. ISBN 978-0-521-12467-6.
- "No. 44687". The London Gazette. 1 October 1968. p. 10537.
- name="contract law"
- Report of the Commission to Consider Legal Procedures to deal with Terrorist Activities in Northern Ireland (Cmmd. 5185); full text of the Diplock Report
- Woolf, Harry (1986). "The Role of the English Judiciary in Developing Public Law". William and Mary Law Review. 27 (4): 675.
- Laws, John (October 1992). "Is the High Court the Guardian of Fundamental Constitutional Rights". Commonwealth Law Bulletin. 18 (4): 1389. doi:10.1080/03050718.1992.9986233.
- Sacks, Vera; Maxwell, Judith (May 1984). "Unnatural Justice for Discriminators". The Modern Law Review. 47 (3): 336–337. JSTOR 1095955.
- Jowell, Jeffrey; Lester, Anthony (April 1988). "Beyond Wednesbury: Substantive Principles of Administrative Law". Commonwealth Law Review. 14 (2): 859. doi:10.1080/03050718.1988.9985971.
- The Hong Kong Fir [1961] EWCA Civ 7
- Moschi v. Lep AirServices Ltd. [1973] A.C. 331 per Lord Diplock, confirmed in Photo Production Ltd. v Securior Transport Ltd. [1980] UKHL 2 at [5] per Lord Wilberforce