K-W Line

The Koningshooikt—Wavre Line, abbreviated to KW Line (French: Ligne KW; Dutch: KW-stelling) and often known as the Dyle Line after the Dijle river, was a 60 kilometres (37 mi)-long fortified line of defence prepared by the Belgian Army between Koningshooikt (Province of Antwerp) and Wavre (Province of Brabant) which was intended to protect Brussels from a possible German invasion. Construction on the KW Line began in September 1939 after World War II had begun but while Belgium itself remained a neutral state.[1] It was subsequently extended southwards from Wavre towards Namur (Province of Namur). The line itself consisted of bunkers, anti-tank ditches, and barricades including so-called Cointet-elements and played a key role in Allied strategy during the German invasion of Belgium in May 1940. However, its role in the actual fighting was ultimately minimal. In 2009 an inventory of surviving emplacements was begun.[2]

View of bunker H4 and the water duct used to flood the area in front of the tank barricade near the village of Haacht. This is part of the K-W line.

Background

In October 1936, Belgium abandoned its previous military alliance with France, fearful that after the German Remilitarization of the Rhineland, bringing German forces to its borders, it would get involved in a Franco-German war. It was recognised that a policy of neutrality could only be viable if Belgium possessed strong defences. Existing defence plans were therefore pursued more vigorously. A strong defence line was created along the Albert Canal, running eastwards from Antwerp to the modern fortress of Eben Emael and from there to the southwest along the River Meuse. Although this was a powerful position, it had been understood from the outset that Belgium could not resist a major German invasion alone and that despite its neutrality would need to cooperate with the French army to block a German advance. Eben Emael was too close to Germany, and the salient it created was too large, to make it practical for assisting French forces to occupy such a forward position. For this reason a shorter defence line was planned between Antwerp and Namur in the south.[3] This should be the "line of main resistance", while the Albert Canal-Meuse line would function as a "covering line", delaying the enemy long enough for allied help to arrive and entrench itself. However, the Belgian government was hesitant to start any large-scale construction along this line as it could be seen by Germany as a breach of neutrality as well as an invitation to occupy the area to the east of it.

After the outbreak of the Second World War, Belgium was under considerable pressure from France and the United Kingdom to take their side even before a German invasion, partly because it was feared Belgian defences would collapse before allied troops had the time to reinforce them. To assuage such fears, the Belgian government hastily ordered to improve the Antwerp-Namur position in September 1939. The construction work was largely done by conscripts mobilised in September but also by about a thousand civilian workers hired from private contractors.

Location

The line in the north was anchored on the old fortress belt of Antwerp. This way the existing Fort Broechem, Fort Lier and Fort Koningshooikt could be used. From the latter fort southwards, the line continued to Haacht, protecting the city of Mechelen. From Haacht it ran to Leuven, which city was incorporated into the frontline. Originally, this had not been the case: in this sector between November 1939 and April 1940 the line was shifted to the east four times. The next twenty kilometres, the line followed the course of the River Dyle until Wavre was reached. The area between Koningshooikt and Wavre represented the main position where the Belgian army itself was expected to fight and to the improvement of which most funds were directed. This explains the name Koningshooikt-Wavre line.[4]

From February 1940 onwards, the line was extended to the south in the direction of Namur, to close the so-called "Gembloux Gap" between the Dyle and the Meuse. Also a branch westwards of Wavre was created, running to Waterloo, Halle and Kester, ending in Ninove. This covered the southern approaches of the Belgian capital Brussels. This extension was more symbolic than real, containing only thirty-eight pillboxes, and served to counter German allegations that the K-W line violated Belgian neutrality by being directed against Germany. The western branch pretended to block a possible French advance.

Structure
Pillbox at Wavre, allowing enfilading fire

The K-W line was not a massive fortification line with modern forts sheltering the artillery, like the French Maginot Line. There were no permanent fortress garrisons occupying it. In case of war, regular infantry divisions had to entrench themselves along the line after having been withdrawn from the Albert Canal-Meuse covering line. Construction work was aimed at preparing this entrenchment by providing a pre-existing infrastructure, consisting of a telephone network, command bunkers, pillboxes for the machine guns, anti-tank obstacles and inundations. Little was done in the way of digging trenches, placing barbed wire entanglements or laying minefields beforehand.

About four hundred concrete pillboxes were constructed. Most of these were placed along a forward line of defence, directly behind main obstacles. To provide some depth, about a kilometre to the west a second line of pillboxes was present. However, when inundations were located in front of the forward line, these were considered to offer enough protection that a second pillbox line could be discarded with. In front of Mechelen, the river Dyle curved to the west. This was seen as an especially vulnerable spot and between the Dyle and the River Nete a third line of pillboxes was constructed covering the eastern approaches of Mechelen. Multiple lines were also present west of Leuven, due to the many changes in the construction plans.

The pillboxes were able to withstand hits by the German 15 cm sFH 18, the heaviest howitzer German infantry divisions were equipped with. They were not of a uniform construction; each pillbox was tailored to adapt to the specific terrain conditions of its location, avoiding dead angles and often allowing enfilading fire. To this end they contained up to three chambers in which a single machine gun could be placed. The machine guns were not permanent fixtures; the troops retreating from the covering line were supposed to bring their MG 08s, called "Maxims", along.

gollark: No. It does need multiple computers. So you should maybe just use Artist.
gollark: Or the good old "Item System".
gollark: You could use one of my good storage systems!
gollark: Even PotatOS does. It'll just error a lot.
gollark: Yes, but it wasn't *invented* by the telecoms people.

See also

References
  1. Jacobsen, Mark; Levine, Robert; Schwabe, William (1985). "Belgian policy". Contingency plans for war in Western Europe, 1920-1940. Santa Monica, CA: Rand. p. 130. ISBN 0-8330-0661-4. OCLC 12215643.
  2. www.kwlinie.be
  3. Vaesen, Joost (2011). "Chapter Ten. Between Passéisme And Modernisation? The Case Of The Belgian Fortification System 1926–1940". In Amersfoort, Herman; Klinkert, Wim (eds.). Small Powers in the Age of Total War, 1900-1940. BRILL. pp. 244–245. doi:10.1163/ej.9789004203211.i-372.70. ISBN 978-90-04-20433-1.
  4. "Antitankgracht". inventaris.onroerenderfgoed.be (in Dutch). Retrieved 2020-07-02.

Further reading
  • Cannaerts, J. (1992). "De Haachtse antitankgracht". Haachts Oudheid- en Geschiedkundig Tijdschrift (in Dutch). 7 (4): 180–190.
  • Cannaerts, J. (1992). "De Haachtse antitankgracht (vervolg)". Haachts Oudheid- en Geschiedkundig Tijdschrift (in Dutch). 8 (1): 15–28.
  • Casteels, R.; Vandegoor, G. (2002). 1940 in de regio Haacht. De Belgische eenheden op de KW-stelling (in Dutch). De Slegte.
  • Demarsin, K. en Berwaerts, K (November 2009). "Bunkers Binnenste Buiten. Een nieuw leven voor de KW-linie" (PDF). Erfwoord (in Dutch) (56): 27–29.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  • Demarsin, K., Berwaerts, K., Deleu, T., Cannaerts, J. en Sels, T. (2010). "De KW-lijn: nutteloos in het verleden, nuttig in het heden" (PDF). Fortengorderls Nu! Actuele omgang met forten, gordels en verdedigingslinies. Verslagboek van het colloquium, Antwerpen, 25-26 september 2009 (in Dutch): 93–103.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  • Epstein, Jonathan (2014). Belgium's Dilemma : the Formation of the Belgian Defense Policy, 1932–1940. Leiden: BRILL. ISBN 978-90-04-25467-1.
  • Pied, Robert (1989). Sous la menace d'une invasion : Wavre, centre antichar et les défenses environnantes sur la ligne KW, 1939-1940" (in French). Tome 1.
  • Pied, Robert (1991). L'enfer de la Dyle : Wavre et environs, mai 1940 (in French). Tome 2.
  • Media related to KW-line at Wikimedia Commons
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.