John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law
The John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law is a student-run law review covering legal scholarship in the field of intellectual property, established in 2001[1] at the John Marshall Law School (Chicago). The journal publishes four issues per year, which are available on LexisNexis and Westlaw. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has cited the journal as a source.[2]
Notable contributions
- John Paul Stevens, Section 43(A) of the Shakespeare Canon of Statutory Construction: The Beverly W. Pattishall Inaugural Lecture in Trademark Law, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 179 (2002).
- Paul Redmond Michel, Founding a New Journal in the Age of Electronic Law, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2001).
- Richard Linn, Effective Appellate Practice Before the Federal Circuit, 2 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 1 (2002).
- Richard Posner, Transaction Costs and Antitrust Concerns in the Licensing of Intellectual Property, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 325 (2005).
- Q. Todd Dickinson, et al., The Genetic Age: Who Owns the Genome?, 2 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 6 (2002) (symposium).
- Marybeth Peters, Copyright & Privacy - Through the Legislative Lens, 4 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 266 (2005).
gollark: Sometimes it's actually okay and sensible, but font configuration... æææææææææææ.
gollark: I run Linux on all my things for consistency. It's great except when stuff is extremely annoying.
gollark: MacOS seems like it's gradually becoming more like iOS.
gollark: I thought the workflow was more along the lines of "open app file, experience error, rightclick it in some specific menu, click "open" there (which works differently to opening it in all the other ways)", but sure.
gollark: Even on the platforms which don't REQUIRE signing (all except the new ARM ones?), they make it very difficult to run code they don't preapprove.
References
- John Marshall Law School web site, Volume 1, Issue 1, Fall 2001 Archived 2007-10-08 at the Wayback Machine. Consulted on February 20, 2007.
- See, e.g., Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe Inc., 42 Fed. Appx. 439, 452 (Fed. Cir. 2002) (citing Harold C. Wegner, An Enzo White Paper: A New Judicial Standard for a Biotechnology “Written Description” Under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶1, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 254, 263 (2002)).
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.