John I, Count of Looz

John I (Jean) (d. 1278 or 1279), Count of Looz and Count of Chiny, eldest son of Arnold IV, Count of Looz and Chiny, and Jeanne, Countess of Chiny. He succeeded his father in 1272 or 1273, as the Count of Looz and Chiny. Virtually nothing is known about his reign.

He first married, in 1258, Matilda, daughter of William IV, Count of Jülich, and Matilda of Gelderland. Their children were:

  • Arnold V, Count of Looz and Count of Chiny (as Arnold II)
  • Louis de Looz
  • William, Seigneur of Neufchatel and Ardenne.

Widowed, he married secondly, in 1269, Isabelle de Conde (d. after 1280), daughter of Jacques, Seigneur of Conde and Bailleul, and his wife Agnes of Rœulx. Their children were:

  • John II (1270-1311), Seigneur of Agimont, Givet and Warcq, married Marie, daughter of Raoul de Nesle and Alix de Roye (see House of Nesle)
  • Jacques (Jacquemin) (d. February 27, 1330), Canon of Liege.

Upon his death, he was succeeded as Count of Chiny by his brother Louis, and as Count of Looz by his son Arnold.

Sources

Settipani, Christian, La Préhistoire des Capétiens (Nouvelle histoire généalogique de l'auguste maison de France, vol. 1), Villeneuve d'Ascq, éd. Patrick van Kerrebrouck, 1993, 545 p.

Thonissen, JJ., Arnold IV, Royal Academy of Belgium, National Biography, Vol. 1, Brussels, 1866

Arlette Laret-Kayser, Entre Bar et Luxembourg : Le Comté de Chiny des Origines à 1300, Bruxelles (éditions du Crédit Communal, Collection Histoire, série in-8°, n° 72), 1986

Medieval Lands Project, Upper Lotharingian Nobility, Comtes de Looz

gollark: Memes can be copied infinitely without the original creator (or whoever you copy from, realistically) losing it.
gollark: The whole concept of a "meme" is that it is shared a lot and maybe gets tweaked and redone and has its text swapped and whatnot as that happens.
gollark: Where are you getting that from? These are just numbers. They're not a count or something.
gollark: I don't think the numbers are meant to represent badness, though.
gollark: The joke here is that you can recover the original numbers via prime factorization!
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.