Janet Oppenheim
Janet Oppenheim (1948–1994) was an American historian.
Oppenheim was born in Manhattan. In 1975, she received her PhD in history from Columbia University. She worked as a professor of history at American University.[1]
She is most well known for her scholarly works on British life in the 19th century.[2] She was the author of the book The Other World: Spiritualism and Psychical Research in England, 1850-1914 (1985) which received positive reviews.[3][4][5][6]
Publications
- The Nationalization of Culture: The Development of State Subsidies to the Arts in Great Britain (published under the name Janet Minihan, 1977)
- The Other World: Spiritualism and Psychical Research in England, 1850-1914 (Cambridge University Press, 1985)
- "Shattered Nerves" : Doctors, Patients, and Depression in Victorian England (Oxford University Press, 1991)
Footnotes
- "Janet Oppenheim, 46, Historian Of British Life in 19th Century". The New York Times.
- Mandler, Peter; Owen, Alex; Koven, Seth; Pedersen, Susan. (1997). Cultural Histories Old and New: Rereading the Work of Janet Oppenheim. Victorian Studies. Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 69-105.
- Cooter, Roger. (1986). The Other World: Spiritualism and Psychical Research in England, 1850-1914 by Janet Oppenheim. The American Historical Review, Vol. 91, No. 2. pp. 398-399.
- Barrow, Logie. (1986). The Other World. Spiritualism and Psychical Research in England, 1850-1914 by Janet Oppenheim. History Workshop Journal, No. 21. pp. 189-190.
- Shortland, Michael. (1986). The Other World: Spiritualism and Psychical Research in England, 1850-1914 by Janet Oppenheim. The British Journal for the History of Science, Vol. 19, No. 2. pp. 219-221.
- Vogeler, Albert R. (1986). The Other World: Spiritualism and Psychical Research in England, 1850-1914 by Janet Oppenheim. Albion: A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 323-324.
gollark: In its black heart, it contains mechanisms for stuff like that which are *not* monadic.
gollark: Uuumuuutuuubuuuluuu?
gollark: Ommotobol.
gollark: `(Comonad q, Whoknows f, Applicative t, Monoid x) => q a (t x f (b)) -> t x (q a (x b)) f f`
gollark: But are they monoids in the category of endofunctors?
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.