Jamie Thompson (cricketer)

James Scott Thompson (born 11 March 1991) is an English former first-class cricketer.

Jamie Thompson
Personal information
Full nameJames Scott Thompson
Born (1991-03-11) 11 March 1991
Shrewsbury, Shropshire, England
Height6 ft 6 in (1.98 m)
BattingRight-handed
BowlingRight-arm medium-fast
Domestic team information
YearsTeam
2012–2013Oxford MCCU
Career statistics
Competition First-class
Matches 2
Runs scored 32
Batting average 8.00
100s/50s –/–
Top score 15
Balls bowled 126
Wickets 1
Bowling average 39.00
5 wickets in innings –
10 wickets in match –
Best bowling 1/13
Catches/stumpings –/–
Source: Cricinfo, 15 July 2020

Young was born at Shrewsbury in March 1991. He was educated at Hurstpierpoint College, before going up to Oxford Brookes University.[1] While studying at Oxford Brookes, he made two appearances in first-class cricket for Oxford MCCU, playing against Glamorgan and Worcestershire at Oxford in 2012 and 2013 respectively.[2][notes 1] He scored 32 runs in his two matches,[3] in addition to taking a single wicket,[4] that of Glamorgan's Ben Wright.[5]

After graduating from Oxford Brookes, Thompson became an osteopath. He has worked in his capacity for both Middlesex County Cricket Club and Tottenham Hotspur.

Notes and references
  1. Oxford MCCU differed from Oxford University Cricket Club in that it was open to students at Oxford Brookes University, whereas Oxford University Cricket Club is exclusively for students of the constituent colleges of the University of Oxford.
  1. "Player profile: Jamie Thompson". CricketArchive. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  2. "First-Class Matches played by Jamie Thompson". CricketArchive. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  3. "First-Class Batting and Fielding For Each Team by Jamie Thompson". CricketArchive. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  4. "First-Class Bowling For Each Team by Jamie Thompson". CricketArchive. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
  5. "Oxford MCCU v Glamorgan, 2012". CricketArchive. Retrieved 15 July 2020.
gollark: It could record locally and upload later, though.
gollark: This person apparently reverse-engineered it statically, not at runtime, but it *can* probably detect if you're trying to reverse-engineer it a bit while running.
gollark: > > App behavior changes slightly if they know you're trying to figure out what they're doing> this sentence makes no sense to me, "if they know"? he's dissecting the code as per his own statement, thus looking at rows of text in various format. the app isn't running - so how can it change? does the app have self-awareness? this sounds like something out of a bad sci-fi movie from the 90's.It's totally possible for applications to detect and resist being debugged a bit.
gollark: > this is standard programming dogma, detailed logging takes a lot of space and typically you enable logging on the fly on clients to catch errors. this is literally cookie cutter "how to build apps 101", and not scary. or, phrased differently, is it scary if all of that logging was always on? obviously not as it's agreed upon and detailed in TikTok's privacy policy (really), so why is it scary that there's an on and off switch?This is them saying that remotely configurable logging is fine and normal; I don't think them being able to arbitrarily gather more data is good.
gollark: > on the topic of setting up a proxy server - it's a very standard practice to transcode and buffer media via a server, they have simply reversed the roles here by having server and client on the client, which makes sense as transcoding is very intensive CPU-wise, which means they have distributed that power requirement to the end user's devices instead of having to have servers capable of transcoding millions of videos.Transcoding media locally is not the same as having some sort of locally running *server* to do it.

Jamie Thompson at ESPNcricinfo

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.