James M. Acton

James M. Acton is a British academic and scientist.[1] He is a senior associate of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.[2]

James M. Acton

Early life

Acton was awarded his PhD in theoretical physics at Cambridge University.[2]

Career

Acton was a member of the faculty of the Department of War Studies at King's College, London.[1]

Acton’s research projects have included analyses of IAEA safeguards in Iran, verifying disarmament in North Korea and preventing novel forms of radiological terrorism.[3]

Fukushima

In the context of the Fukushima I nuclear accidents, Acton was able to distill a succinct analysis which was widely reported.[4]

  • "Fukushima is not the worst nuclear accident ever but it is the most complicated and the most dramatic...This was a crisis that played out in real time on TV. Chernobyl did not."[5]
  • "The key question is whether we have correctly predicted the risk that a reactor could be hit by a disaster (natural or man-made) that is bigger than it is designed to withstand."[6]

Selected works

In a statistical overview derived from writings by and about James Acton, OCLC/WorldCat encompasses roughly 7 works in 10+ publications in 1 language and 268 library holdings.[7]

  • The Use of Voluntary Safeguards to Build Trust in States' Nuclear Programmes: the Case of Iran (2007)
  • Beyond the Dirty Bomb: Re-thinking Radiological Terror (2007)
  • Abolishing Nuclear Weapons (2008), with George Perkovich
  • Abolishing Nuclear Weapons: A Debate (2009), with George Perkovich
  • Deterrence During Disarmament: Deep Nuclear Reductions and International Security, and Low Numbers: A Practical Path to Deep Nuclear Reductions (2011)

Notes

  1. Library of Congress authority file, James M. Acton, no2009-183674
  2. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, James M. Acton Archived 14 March 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  3. "Carnegie Appoints Leading Expert on Nuclear Disarmament and Nonproliferation," Carnegie Endowment press release, 18 November 2008.
  4. "One Month After Tsunami, What Are Japan's Biggest Needs?" NewsHour (U.S.) 11 April 2011. Archived 12 April 2011 at WebCite
  5. "Analysis: A month on, Japan nuclear crisis still scarring," International Business Times (Australia). 9 April 2011, retrieved 2011-04-12. Archived 18 April 2011 at WebCite
  6. Owen, Jonathan. "More than one in 10 nuclear power plants at risk from earthquakes," The Independent (UK). 3 April 2011. Archived 3 April 2011 at WebCite
  7. WorldCat Identities Archived 30 December 2010 at the Wayback Machine: Acton, James M.
gollark: As well as making it much more practical to drive arbitrarily long distances, it is nuclear and thus COOL and GOOD. No downsides!
gollark: No more range anxiety, just load a fresh fuel rod in every few years.
gollark: Actually, nuclear fission to power an *e-*bike is silly! It would be more efficient to directly drive the wheels with the turbines.
gollark: But only two of them, so it's a bike.
gollark: Why not put wheels on ITER, the experimental fusion thing?
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.