Increased Penalties Act

The Increased Penalties Act was a bill that increased the penalties for violating prohibition. Enacted on March 2, 1929, it is also called the "Jones–Stalker Act" or the "Jones Act". The legislation was sponsored by two Republicans, Sen. Wesley L. Jones of Washington and Rep. Gale H. Stalker of upstate New York State. It stipulated that wherever any penalty was prescribed for the illegal manufacture, sale, transportation, importation, or exportation of intoxicating liquor as defined in the Volstead Act of 1919, the penalty imposed for each such offense should be a fine not to exceed $10,000 or imprisonment not to exceed five years, or both. The Act did not repeal any minimum penalties then prescribed by law. It further declared that it was the intent of Congress that the courts, in sentencing offenders, "should discriminate between casual or slight violations and habitual sales of intoxicating liquor, or attempts to commercialize violations of the law."

Increased Penalties Act
Other short titles
  • Jones Act
  • Jones–Stalker Act
Long titleAn Act to amend the National Prohibition Act, as amended and supplemented.
NicknamesProhibition Penalties Act
Enacted bythe 70th United States Congress
EffectiveMarch 2, 1929
Citations
Public law70-899
Statutes at Large45 Stat. 1446
Codification
Acts amendedNational Prohibition Act
Titles amended27 U.S.C.: Intoxicating Liquors
U.S.C. sections created27 U.S.C. ch. 4 §§ 91, 92
Legislative history

Its purpose, as explained by Sen. Jones, was to stiffen the penalties against those convicted of violating Prohibition for commercial purposes.[1] In particular, the Act increased the penalties for importing, transporting, and exporting liquor, to match the existing penalties for manufacturing and selling it. All five of these activities were expressly forbidden by the 18th Amendment, but the Volstead Act did not penalize importation or transportation as heavily as manufacture or sale.[1]

The bill passed the Senate on February 19, 1929, by a vote of 65 to 18.[2] On February 28 the House passed it by a vote of 284 to 90[3] (also reported as 283 to 90[4]). President Calvin Coolidge signed the legislation on March 2, 1929.[5]

The Jones Law affects primarily the punishment provision of the Volstead Law, and might as a matter of technique have been made an amendment thereof. Its legal consequences are very considerable, since it materially changes the substantive nature of liquor law violations, and the procedural problems of those charged with punishment thereof. Its influence will even be felt in the state courts. Finally, it vests in the judges of the federal courts a wide and very important discretion.[1]

The Jones Law does not alone increase maximum penalties, it makes an important change in the classification. A judge sentencing a violator of the Volstead Act is now faced with the following admonition:

That wherever a penalty or penalties are prescribed in a criminal prosecution by the National Prohibition Act, as amended and supplemented, for the illegal manufacture, sale, transportation, importation, or exportation of intoxicating liquor, as defined by Section 1, Title II, of the National Prohibition Act, the penalty imposed for each such offense shall be a fine not to exceed $10,000 or imprisonment not to exceed five years, or both: Provided, That it is the intent of Congress that the court, in imposing sentence hereunder, should discriminate between casual or slight violations and habitual sales of intoxicating liquor, or attempts to commercialize violations of the law. "Sec. 2. This Act shall not repeal nor eliminate any minimum penalty for the first or any subsequent offense now provided by the said National Prohibition Act.[1]

Notes

  1. "DEPARTMENT OF CURRENT LEGISLATION: The Jones-Stalker Law — Its Legal Consequences". American Bar Association Journal. 15 (5): 276–278, 296. 1929.
  2. "Dry Penalties Bill Passed by Senate". New York Times. 1929-02-20. p. 1. Retrieved 2011-06-24.
  3. "TO PASS S. 2901, (45 STAT. 1446, APP. 3-2-1929), A BILL TO AMEND THE NATIONAL PROHIBITION ACT. (P. 4796-1)". govtrack.us. Retrieved 2020-01-16.
  4. "Dry Penalties Bill with 5-Year Term Passed by House". New York Times. 1929-03-01. p. 1. Retrieved 2020-01-16.
  5. "Coolidge Signs Bill for Stiff Dry Penalties". New York Times. 1929-03-03. p. 3. Retrieved 2011-06-24.
gollark: Depends what the time interval is? People go out more (→ more spread and stuff) on weekends, for instance.
gollark: You could probably do safety briefs by video call, if there's not much participation.
gollark: Oh, you mean "legally considered essential by some things".
gollark: Why?
gollark: Maybe I should try and stop hedging and actually directly say "no, you aren't".
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.