If You Want Me
If You Want Me is the final solo studio album recorded by R&B and Gospel singer Carolyn Franklin (sister of Aretha Franklin) for RCA Records, in 1976.
| If You Want Me | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Studio album by Carolyn Franklin | ||||
| Released | 1976 | |||
| Recorded | RCA Studios, New York City | |||
| Genre | Gospel, R&B | |||
| Length | 34:15 | |||
| Label | RCA | |||
| Producer | Jimmy Radcliffe | |||
| Carolyn Franklin chronology | ||||
| ||||
Track listing
Side One
- "From the Bottom of My Heart (To the Bottom of Yours)" (Carolyn Franklin, Pearl Jones) - 2:28
- "If You Want Me" (Carolyn Franklin, Jimmy Radcliffe) - 2:53
- "I Can't Help Myself Feeling So Blue" (Jillean Williams, Wade Marcus) - 5:35
- "Too Many Roads" (Carolyn Franklin, Sonny Sanders) - 3:00
- "Sunshine Holiday" (Pearl Jones, Sonny Sanders) - 2:08
- "Dead Man" (Carolyn Franklin, Val Benson, Wade Marcus) - 2:53
Side Two
- "You Are Everything" (Thom Bell, Linda Creed) - 2:39
- "You Can Have My Soul" (Pearl Jones, Sonny Sanders) - 3:54
- "Soul Man" (Ernie Cate, Earl Cate, Wade Marcus) - 2:59
- "Not Enough to Hold" (Carolyn Franklin, Sonny Sanders) - 3:00
- "Deal with It" (Carolyn Franklin, Pearl Jones) - 3:20
Personnel
- Carolyn Franklin - vocals
- Jimmy Radcliffe - producer, arranger, conductor
- Wade Marcus - arranger, conductor
- Sonny Sanders - arranger, conductor
- Ivy Jo Hunter - assistant producer
- Paul Goodman - recording engineer
- David H. Hecht, Nick Sangiamo - photography
gollark: I guess maybe in politics/economics/sociology the alternative is something like "lean on human intuition" or "make the correct behaviour magically resolve from self-interest". Not sure how well those actually work.
gollark: - the replication crisis does exist, but it's not like *every paper* has a 50% chance of being wrong - it's mostly in some fields and you can generally estimate which things won't replicate fairly well without much specialized knowledge- science™ agrees on lots of things, just not some highly politicized things- you *can* do RCTs and correlation studies and such, which they seem to be ignoring- some objectivity is better than none- sure, much of pop science is not great, but that doesn't invalidate... all science- they complain about running things based on "trial and error and guesswork", but then don't offer any alternative
gollark: The alternative to basing things on science, I mean. The obvious alternative seems to basically just be guessing?
gollark: What's the alternative? Science is at least *slightly* empirical and right. Also, the video is wrong.
gollark: Fast video encoding is less space-efficient and/or worse quality.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.