INS Ariadne (1839)

INS Ariadne was a flat-bottomed iron paddle steamer built in England in 1839 for the Indian Navy of the Bombay Government of the British East India Company. She was shipped to India in pieces and assembled at the Bombay Dockyard in 1840. She sailed from India to join the British fleet off Shanghai, China, during the First Opium War but was damaged and later foundered on 23 June 1842.

For other ships with the same name, see Ariadne (ship) and HMS Ariadne.

History
British East India Company
Namesake: Ariadne
Builder: John Laird, Birkenhead Iron Works[1]
Launched: December 1839[1]
Fate: Foundered 23 June 1842
General characteristics
Type: Steam paddle sloop[2][3]
Tons burthen: 432[1] (bm)
Length: 139 ft (42.4 m)[3]
Beam: 26 ft (7.9 m)[3]
Propulsion: 70hp steam engine
Armament: 3 guns[2]

Origin

Ariadne and Medusa were sent out because of the outbreak of war with China. The Bombay Dockyard's steam department assembled the two vessels.[4]

Fate

On 8 June 1842 the British fleet rendezvoused off the Amherst Rocks (31°11′N 122°22′E).[5] Ariadne, Lieutenant John Roberts, had recently come out from India to join the fleet. She struck on the point of a rock 7​1⁄4 miles W by S​1⁄4S from the Amherst Rocks. The rock, which became known for a time as Ariadne Rock, had three to five feet of water on it at the time of the accident.[6][5]

Striking the rock knocked a hole in Ariadne's bottom and the engine-room compartment filled with water. Lieutenant Roberts promptly got a sail under her bottom. Once the leak was under control, INS Sesostris towed Ariadne to Chusan; Sesostris then returned to the fleet.[5]

When Ariadne arrived at Chusan she was run ashore for repairs. Lieutenant Roberts imprudently refloated her on the night of 23 June. She then slid off a mud bank and sank in ten fathoms of water.[7] Her officers and crew escaped, but three Chinese drowned.[8] It was found impossible to raise her. The EIC suspended Roberts from duty.[7]

Citations and references

Citations

  1. Hackman (2001), p. 325.
  2. Wadia (1957), p. 345.
  3. Colledge & Warlow (2006), p. 22.
  4. Low (1870), pp. 62–63.
  5. Low (1870), p. 150.
  6. Colchester & Collinson (1845), p. 130.
  7. Indian Mail Vol.1 (1843), p.248.
  8. Low (1870), p. 150 fn.

References

  • Colchester, the Right Hon. Lord; Collinson (RN), Captain (1845). "On the Yang-tsze-kiang". Journal of the Royal Geographical Society of London. 17: 130–145.
  • Colledge, J. J.; Warlow, Ben (2006) [1969]. Ships of the Royal Navy: The Complete Record of all Fighting Ships of the Royal Navy (Rev. ed.). London: Chatham Publishing. ISBN 978-1-86176-281-8.
  • Hackman, Rowan (2001). Ships of the East India Company. Gravesend, Kent: World Ship Society. ISBN 0-905617-96-7.
  • Low, Charles Rathbone (1877). History of the Indian Navy: (1613-1863). R. Bentley and son.
  • Wadia, R. A. (1986) [1957]. The Bombay Dockyard and the Wadia Master Builders. Bombay.
gollark: Maybe.
gollark: That won't technically operate *forever* without harvesting more stuff.
gollark: Firstly, technological progress allows more efficient use of the existing limited resources.Secondly, technological progress allows more efficient extraction of more, as well as access to more in e.g. sspæceë.Thirdly, unless perfect recycling exists somehow, I don't think there's an actual alternative beyond slowly scaling down humanity and dying out or something. Or maybe regressing living standards.
gollark: I do find the "finite resources exist so arbitrary growth isn't possible" argument quite bee for various reasons however.
gollark: Sure, I guess. It isn't very actionable either way.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.