ICWATCH

ICWATCH is a public database of mainly LinkedIn profiles of people in the United States Intelligence Community. The database was created by Transparency Toolkit and is hosted by WikiLeaks.[2]

ICWATCH
Available inEnglish
Created byTransparency Toolkit
URLicwatch.wikileaks.org
CommercialNo
LaunchedMay 6, 2015 (2015-05-06)
Current statusOnline
Written in

Background

The publication of global surveillance disclosures in 2013 revealed code names for surveillance projects including MARINA and MAINWAY.[3][4] It was then discovered that the LinkedIn profiles of individuals in the intelligence community mentioned these code names as well as additional ones.[5][6] Transparency Toolkit took advantage of this and automated the collection of LinkedIn profiles mentioning such code names, collating them into a searchable database.[2][7][8]

Name

The name "ICWATCH" is a play on ICREACH, an alleged top-secret, surveillance-related search engine created by the United States National Security Agency (NSA) after the September 11 attacks.[2][9]

History

The initial commit to the Git repository of LookingGlass was made on August 23, 2014.[10] LookingGlass is a search tool that was built for use in ICWATCH.[7]

ICWATCH launched on May 6, 2015;[11] on the same day, Transparency Toolkit, the group that created ICWATCH, presented it at the re:publica conference.[2] At launch, the database contained information from over 27,000 LinkedIn profiles.[2][12]

By mid-May 2015, Transparency Toolkit began receiving requests from individuals to be removed from ICWATCH, including death threats.[13][14] Following the threats as well as distributed denial-of-service attacks made against the site, WikiLeaks began hosting the website and database by the end of May 2015.[13][15]

By May 20, 2015, the number of profiles in ICWATCH had increased to almost 140,000.[14]

In August 2016 TechCrunch reported that LinkedIn was suing 100 unnamed individuals who had scraped LinkedIn's website, and named ICWATCH as a possible target.[16]

As of February 2017, the database tracks over 100,000 profiles from LinkedIn, Indeed, and other public sources.[17]

Features

The database can be searched using the company, location, industry, and other parameters of the intelligence workers.[2]

Findings

Most of the discovered profiles are not of those in the National Security Agency but of those working for contractors.[2]

The project also revealed possible trends in employment in the intelligence community. For instance, the "number of people claiming to work with SIGINT databases […] has increased dramatically over the years since 2008, with just a small decline starting in 2013."[2]

M. C. McGrath of Transparency Toolkit believes that the workers are "for the most part, pretty normal people".[2]

Reception

Ian Paul of PC World voiced concern for the safety of the individuals listed in the database.[12]

gollark: For labels, 20Hz.
gollark: For redstone, yes.
gollark: Labelnet could do 600B/s, though, it's way better than 20B/s from Bundlenet.
gollark: I got the basic stuff worked out ages ago, primarily just the 256→187 encoding, but I never figured out how exactly it ought to work for actual use.
gollark: > Heh.. This is as bad as using labels for communication between side touching computers.I really should work out the high level labelnet API!

See also

References
  1. "Transparency Toolkit". GitHub. Retrieved February 22, 2017.
  2. Joseph Cox (May 7, 2015). "This Database Gathers the Resumes of 27,000 Intelligence Workers". Vice.com. Motherboard. Retrieved February 22, 2017.
  3. Barton Gellman (June 15, 2013). "U.S. surveillance architecture includes collection of revealing Internet, phone metadata". The Washington Post. Retrieved February 26, 2017.
  4. Mike Masnick (June 17, 2013). "Why The NSA and President Bush Got the FISA Court to Reinterpret the Law in Order to Collect Tons of Data". Techdirt. Retrieved February 26, 2017.
  5. Christopher Soghoian (June 15, 2013). "Tweet by @csoghoian". Twitter. Retrieved February 26, 2017. Linkedin profiles of people in Maryland that mention MARINA & NUCLEON have some fun other codenames like TRAFFICTHIEF
  6. Mike Masnick (June 18, 2013). "Discovering Names of Secret NSA Surveillance Programs Via LinkedIn". Techdirt. Retrieved February 26, 2017.
  7. Rob O'Neill (May 6, 2015). "LinkedIn serves up resumes of 27,000 US intelligence personnel". ZDNet. Retrieved February 22, 2017.
  8. Kalev Leetaru (August 13, 2016). "Is Government Secrecy Dead in the Internet and Social Media Era?". Forbes. Archived from the original on February 22, 2017. Retrieved February 22, 2017. Last year the Transparency Toolkit released ICWATCH, a searchable database of more than 27,000 intelligence community employees, culled entirely from keyword searches of information IC employees uploaded themselves to LinkedIn. Indeed, ICWATCH demonstrated that myriad highly classified programs were openly listed on LinkedIn profiles, often with enough contextual information to at least guess at their application area.
  9. Gallagher, Ryan (Aug 25, 2014). "The Surveillance Engine: How the NSA Built Its Own Secret Google". The Intercept.
  10. M.C. McGrath (Shidash) (August 23, 2014). "First version". GitHub.
  11. M.C. McGrath (May 6, 2015). "ICWATCH". Transparency Toolkit. Retrieved February 22, 2017.
  12. Ian Paul (May 7, 2015). "New database taps LinkedIn to watch the NSA watchers". PCWorld. Retrieved February 22, 2017.
  13. Rob O'Neill (May 19, 2015). "Death threat, FBI complaint greet launch of intelligence community database". ZDNet. Retrieved February 22, 2017.
  14. "WikiLeaks takes spy contractor database under its wing amid death threats". RT International. May 20, 2015. Retrieved February 22, 2017.
  15. "The Kill List: ICWatch Uses LinkedIn Account Info to Out Officials Who Aided Assassination Program". Democracy Now!. May 28, 2015. Retrieved February 22, 2017.
  16. Kate Conger (August 15, 2016). "LinkedIn sues anonymous data scrapers". TechCrunch. Retrieved February 22, 2017.
  17. "ICWATCH". Transparency Toolkit. Retrieved February 22, 2017.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.