Hubert Bourdot

Hubert Bourdot (30 October 1861 – 30 September 1937) was a French Roman Catholic priest and mycologist who was a native of Imphy, a community in the department of Nièvre.

Hubert Bourdot

From 1898 until his death, Bourdot was a parish priest in Saint-Priest-en-Murat. He was a member of the Société mycologique de France, serving as its vice-president in 1919, and later becoming an honorary president (1929). He bequeathed his mycological collection to the Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle in Paris.

With mycologist Amédée Galzin (1853–1925), he was co-author of a series of publications (1909–1925) involving Hymenomycetes native to France (published in the Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France).

Selected publications
  • Hyménomycètes de France: I. Heterobasidiés, 1909
  • Hyménomycètes de France: II. Homobasidiés: Clavariés et Cyphellés, 1910
  • Hyménomycètes de France: III. Corticiées: Corticium, Epithele, Asterostromella, 1911
  • Hyménomycètes de France: IV. Corticiées: Vuilleminia, Aleurodiscus, Dendrothele, Gloeocystidium, Peniophora, 1912
  • Hyménomycètes de France: V. Hydnées, 1914
  • Hyménomycètes de France: VI. Asterostromés, 1920
  • Hyménomycètes de France: VII. Stereum, 1921
  • Hyménomycètes de France: VIII. Hymenochaete, 1923
  • Hyménomycètes de France: IX. Meruliés, 1923
  • Hyménomycètes de France. X. Phylactèriés, 1924
  • Hyménomycètes de France, XI., 1925
  • Heterobasidiae nondum descriptae, 1924 (descriptions of a few jelly fungi), with Galzin in: Bulletin de la Société Mycologique de France.
  • Contribution à la Flore Mycologique de la France: I. Hyménomycètes de France. Hétérobasidiés-Homobasidiés Gymnocarpes, with Galzin (761 pp.), 1927.
gollark: For example, I do not really donate money to charity, despite at least having theoretically nonzero money. I feel somewhat guilty about this if I think about it very hard.
gollark: Distributing punishment based on that would make things like advertisements for charities horrible infohazards.
gollark: If you want to know about what *you* should do, then it's more reasonable to ask about the morality of actions, not people, because the people way runs into accursed counterfactuals very fast.
gollark: For that the purpose is probably something like "should you be eternally tortured", which I think the answer to is literally always "no".
gollark: First, consider for what purpose you want to know whether it's "evil" or not to have been that person.

References
  1. IPNI.  Bourdot.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.