Hollywood accounting

Hollywood accounting (also known as Hollywood bookkeeping) refers to the opaque or creative accounting methods used by the film, video, and television industry to budget and record profits for film projects. Expenditures can be inflated to reduce or eliminate the reported profit of the project, thereby reducing the amount which the corporation must pay in taxes and royalties or other profit-sharing agreements, as these are based on the net profit.

Hollywood accounting gets its name from its prevalence in the entertainment industry—that is, in the movie studios of Hollywood at a time when most studios were located in Hollywood. Those affected can include writers and actors, but also production companies, producers and investors.[1][2] A number of cases of creative accounting have been successfully pursued in court and resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in awarded damages.

Practices

Hollywood accounting can take several forms. In one form, a subsidiary is formed to perform a given activity and the parent entity will extract money out of the film's revenue in the form of charges for certain "services". For example, a film studio has a distribution arm as a sub-entity, which will then charge the studio a "distribution fee" — essentially, the studio charging itself a sum it has total control over and hence control the profitability report of a project.[3]

Another form of Hollywood accounting is a reverse Tobashi scheme, in which the studio unjustly cross-collateralizes the accounting of two projects and shifts losses from a flop onto a profitable project by shifting costs involving internal operations. This way, two unprofitable projects are created out of one on paper alone, primarily for the purpose of eliminating net participation liabilities. The specific schemes can range from the simple and obvious to the extremely complex. Generally, Hollywood accounting utilizes permanent creative accounting practices (such as charging an arbitrary distribution fee from one sub-entity to another) rather than temporary ones (like the Repo 105 scheme) since the measures are meant to permanently distort the bottom line of a film project.

Three main factors in Hollywood accounting reduce the reported profit of a movie, and all have to do with the calculation of overhead:

  • Production overhead: Studios, on average, calculate production overhead by using a figure around 15% of total production costs.
  • Distribution overhead: Film distributors typically keep 30% of what they receive from movie theaters ("gross rentals").
  • Marketing overhead: To determine this number, studios usually choose about 10% of all advertising costs.

All of the above means of calculating overhead are highly controversial, even within the accounting profession. Namely, these percentages are assigned without much regard to how, in reality, these estimates relate to actual overhead costs. In short, this method does not, by any rational standard, attempt to adequately trace overhead costs.

Because of the studio's ability to place arbitrary charges along the Value chain, net participation "points" (a percentage of the net income as opposed to a percentage of the gross income of a film) are sometimes referred to as "monkey points". The term is attributed to Eddie Murphy, who is said to have also stated that only a fool would accept net points in their contract.[4][5]

Actress Lynda Carter on The Late Show with Joan Rivers commented "Don't ever settle for net profits. It's called 'creative accounting'."[6]

Many insist on "gross points" (a percentage of some definition of gross revenue) rather than net profit participation. This practice reduces the likelihood of a project showing a profit, as a production company will claim a portion of the reported box-office revenue was diverted directly to gross point participants. However, gross participation is a rare bargaining chip allowed by the studios and hence hard to obtain unless the person has considerable leverage in the deal - such as an A-list star, director or producer who is vital for a project.

Examples

According to Lucasfilm, Return of the Jedi, despite having earned $475 million at the box office against a budget of $32.5 million, "has never gone into profit".[7]

Art Buchwald received a settlement from Paramount after his lawsuit Buchwald v. Paramount. The court found Paramount's actions "unconscionable", noting that it was impossible to believe that Eddie Murphy's 1988 comedy Coming to America, which grossed $288 million, failed to make a profit, especially since the actual production costs were less than a tenth of that. Paramount settled for $900,000,[8] rather than have its accounting methods closely scrutinized.

Producers Michael Uslan and Benjamin Melniker filed a breach of contract lawsuit in Los Angeles County Superior Court on March 26, 1992. Uslan and Melniker claimed to be "the victims of a sinister campaign of fraud and coercion that has cheated them out of continuing involvement in the production of the 1989 film Batman and its sequels. We were denied proper credits, and deprived of any financial rewards for our indispensable creative contribution to the success of Batman."[9] A superior court judge rejected the lawsuit. Total revenues of Batman have topped $2 billion, with Uslan claiming to have "not seen a penny more than that since our net profit participation has proved worthless."[9] Warner Bros. offered the pair an out-of-court pay-off, a sum described by Uslan and Melniker's attorney as "two popcorns and two Cokes".[10]

The estate of Jim Garrison sued Warner Bros. for their share of the profits from the movie JFK (1991), which was based on Garrison's book On the Trail of the Assassins.[11] The case was settled in 1999, with Garrison's estate receiving a "very small settlement."[12]

Winston Groom's price for the screenplay rights to his novel Forrest Gump included a 3% share of the profits; however, due to Hollywood accounting, the film's commercial success was converted into a net loss, and Groom received only $350,000 for the rights and an additional $250,000 from the studio.[13]

Screenwriter Ed Solomon says that Sony claims Men in Black has never broken even, despite grossing nearly $600 million against a $90 million budget.[14]

Gone in 60 Seconds grossed $240 million at the box office, but the studio declared a $212 million loss, primarily through Hollywood accounting as explained on NPR.[15] The real figure is likely closer to $90 million.[16]

Stan Lee, co-creator of the character Spider-Man, had a contract awarding him 10% of the net profits of anything based on his characters. The film Spider-Man (2002) made more than $800 million in revenue, but the producers claim that it did not make any profit as defined in Lee's contract, and Lee received nothing. In 2002 he filed a lawsuit against Marvel Comics.[17] The case was settled in January 2005, with Marvel paying $10 million to "finance past and future payments claimed by Mr. Lee."[18]

The 2002 film My Big Fat Greek Wedding was considered hugely successful for an independent film, yet according to the studio, the film lost money.[19] Accordingly, the cast (with the exception of Nia Vardalos who had a separate deal) sued the studio for their part of the profits. The original producers of the film have sued Gold Circle Films due to Hollywood accounting practices because the studio has claimed the film, which cost less than $6 million to make and made over $350 million at the box office, lost $20 million.[20]

Peter Jackson, director of The Lord of the Rings, and his studio Wingnut Films, brought a lawsuit against New Line Cinema after an audit. Jackson stated this is regarding "certain accounting practices". In response, New Line stated that their rights to a film of The Hobbit were time-limited, and since Jackson would not work with them again until the suit was settled, he would not be asked to direct The Hobbit, as had been anticipated.[21] Fifteen actors are suing New Line Cinema, claiming that they have never received their 5% of revenue from merchandise sold in relation to the movie, which contains their likenesses.[22] Similarly, the Tolkien estate sued New Line, claiming that their contract entitled them to 7.5% of the gross receipts of the $6 billion hit.[23] According to New Line's accounts, the trilogy made "horrendous losses" and no profit at all.[24]

Michael Moore sued Bob and Harvey Weinstein in February 2011, claiming that they had used creative accounting to deprive him of his share of profits for the film Fahrenheit 9/11. Eventually, Moore reached a settlement with the Weinsteins and the lawsuit was dropped.[25]

A Warner Bros. receipt was leaked online, showing that the hugely successful movie Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix ended up with a $167 million loss on paper after grossing nearly $1 billion.[26] This is especially egregious given that, without inflation adjustment, the Wizarding World film series is the third highest-grossing film series of all time both domestically and internationally, after Star Wars and the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 remains the highest-grossing movie ever for Warner Bros.[27] The Hollywood accounting in the Harry Potter case included a $60 million interest charge on a $400 million budget over two years – an interest rate far higher than industry standard[28]—as well as high distribution and advertising fees paid out to Warner Bros. subsidiaries and sister companies.

The Walt Disney Company lost a $270 million lawsuit in 2010 to Celador over accounting tricks used to mask profits on the Who Wants to Be a Millionaire licensed franchise in the United States: "ABC artificially deflated fees the network should have paid the production company BVT and Disney-owned Valleycrest, which in turn decreased Celador's share of revenue. Loss of merchandising revenue was also claimed."[29]

Don Johnson won a lawsuit against Rysher Entertainment which had attempted to wipe profits for the show Nash Bridges off the books in order to reduce Johnson's 50% backend stake to zero; the jury awarded Johnson $23.2 million in damages.[30]

21st Century Fox was found guilty of using Hollywood accounting practice to defraud the producers and stars of the procedural drama Bones and ordered to pay $179 million in missing profits, with the ruling made public.[31]

Despite grossing $153 million against a $26 million budget, the 2019 romantic-comedy Yesterday reportedly lost $87.8 million, according to Universal Pictures accounting sheets.[32]

gollark: Hello, boi.
gollark: I can make you a classifier which will say if something is a painting or some other thing.
gollark: Define "appreciate".
gollark: I am not accepting feedback on this at this time. Goodbye.
gollark: You're clearly wrong due to the Cayley-Hamilton theorem, various gollariosity axioms, and a trivial proof by contradiction by meanness.

See also

References
  1. McDougal, Dennis (December 29, 1989). "Judge Must Solve Buchwald-Murphy Whodunit: Lawsuits: Final arguments in multimillion-dollar complaint against Paramount are over. Both sides accuse the other of stealing idea for $300-million movie". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved March 23, 2014.
  2. Vincent, Mal (February 20, 1995). "After 61 films, Connery remains much in demand". The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved March 23, 2014. I hired my own bookkeepers to keep a watch on everything. Hollywood bookkeeping can be very suspect.
  3. Thompson, Derek (September 14, 2011). "How Hollywood Accounting Can Make a $450 Million Movie 'Unprofitable'". The Atlantic. Retrieved March 23, 2014.
  4. McDougal, Dennis (February 4, 1990). "Murphy Movie Made Millions But Stayed in Red, Studio Ledgers Say". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved March 23, 2014.
  5. Leibman, Jordan H. (November 1, 1993). "Fatal Subtraction: The Inside Story of Buchwald v. Paramount". AllBusiness.com. Archived from the original on February 1, 2009. Retrieved March 23, 2014.
    "By the way, you called net profit participation points yesterday 'monkey points.' What's the origin of that, do you know?" I asked Eddie [Murphy] as I started to pick up my papers. "Well, it's like 'stupid' points. Stupid to take the points." "Won't be any net profits?" "You sit there with your points going, 'Eeeh, eeh, eeh, eeh, eeh'."
  6. The Late Show with Joan Rivers. Fox Network. Air date: February 9, 1987
  7. Sciretta, Peter (April 5, 2009). "LucasFilm Tells Darth Vader that Return of the Jedi Hasn't Made a Profit!?". Slashfilm.com. Retrieved July 19, 2013.
  8. (http://articles.latimes.com/1992-03-17/local/me-3895_1_net-profit Buchwald, Partner Win $900,000 From Studio)
  9. Nancy Griffin; Kim Masters (1997). "Hit Men". Hit & Run: How Jon Peters and Peter Guber Took Sony For A Ride In Hollywood. Simon & Schuster. pp. 158–174. ISBN 0-684-80931-1.
  10. Olly Richards (September 1992). "Trouble in Gotham", Empire, pp. 21-23. Retrieved on 2008-08-14.
  11. Robb, David (June 19, 1996). "Hollywood accounting suffers a blow in court Lawsuit: Movie studios lose first round in potentially crucial court battle as judge upholds class-action". The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved March 23, 2014.
  12. Robb, David (April 12, 1999). "Family settles suit filed over 'JFK' profits". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Retrieved March 23, 2014.
  13. Weinraub, Bernard (May 25, 1995). "'Gump,' a Huge Hit, Still Isn't Raking In Huge Profits? Hmm". The New York Times. Retrieved March 23, 2014.
  14. Butler, Tom (December 31, 2020). "1997 hit 'Men In Black' is still yet to make a profit says screenwriter". Yahoo!. Retrieved May 21, 2020.
  15. "We See Angelina's Bottom Line". NPR.org. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
  16. Edward Jay Epstein (May 16, 2005). "Gross Misunderstanding: Forget about the box office". Slate.com. Retrieved December 30, 2006.
  17. "Lawsuit filed by Spider-Man creator". BBC News. November 13, 2002. Retrieved March 23, 2014.
  18. Ives, Nat (April 29, 2005). "Marvel Settles With a Spider-Man Creator". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved June 5, 2018.
  19. "My Big Fat Greek Wedding: Most Profitable Independent Film in History, With Over $600 Million Worldwide Receipts, Supposedly Loses Over $20 Million". PR Newswire. July 1, 2003. Retrieved March 23, 2014.
  20. Munoz, Lorenza (August 8, 2007). "Hanks sues over profit on 'Greek Wedding'". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved March 23, 2014.
  21. xoanon (November 19, 2006). "Peter Jackson and Fran Walsh Talk THE HOBBIT". TheOneRing.net. Retrieved July 19, 2013.
  22. "15 actors sue New Line Cinema over 'Lord of the Rings' profits". USA Today. June 6, 2007. Retrieved July 19, 2013.
  23. The Associated Press: Tolkien Estate Sues New Line Cinema, February 12, 2008.
  24. Scherer, Karyn (December 13, 2010). "The Hollywood shell game". The New Zealand Herald. Auckland. Retrieved July 19, 2013.
  25. Michael Moore, Harvey Weinstein Settle 'Fahrenheit 9/11' Lawsuit, by Matthew Belloni, at The Hollywood Reporter; published February 15, 2012; retrieved March 23, 2014
  26. "'Hollywood Accounting' Losing In The Courts". Techdirt. July 8, 2010. Retrieved July 19, 2013.
  27. "The Most Successful Movie Franchises In History". Forbes. Retrieved November 23, 2016.
  28. Jr, Mike Fleming; Jr, Mike Fleming (July 6, 2010). "STUDIO SHAME! Even Harry Potter Pic Loses Money Because Of Warner Bros' Phony Baloney Net Profit Accounting". Deadline. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
  29. Belloni, Matthew (July 12, 2010). "'Millionaire' verdict! Disney loses big". Esq. | THR. The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on July 12, 2010. Retrieved April 22, 2020 – via Wayback Machine.
  30. Bond, Paul; Matthew Belloni (July 15, 2010). "'Nash Bridges' verdict! Now Don Johnson wins big!". Esq. | THR. The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on July 15, 2010. Retrieved September 29, 2019 – via Wayback Machine.
  31. "Fox Rocked by $179M 'Bones' Ruling: Lying, Cheating and "Reprehensible" Studio Fraud" from The Hollywood Reporter (February 27, 2019)
  32. D'Alessandro, Anthony (May 5, 2020). "'Yesterday' Net Profit Statement Shows It's The Same Old Song On Hollywood Accounting". Deadline Hollywood. Retrieved May 5, 2020.

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.