Ho v. San Francisco Unified School District

Ho v. San Francisco Unified School District was a 1994 lawsuit by the Asian American Legal Foundation challenging the use of racial quotas limiting the enrollment of Chinese Americans by the San Francisco Unified School District.[1] As a result of the case, San Francisco Unified school district switched to a system using a "diversity index" that excluded race as an alternative to the quota system.

Ten years later

The Ho case ended express use of race in San Francisco public school assignment. The parties to the original desegregation agreement (NAACP v. SFUSD) failed to respond to the challenge to justify the use of race as a factor in admissions. The Ho case was not an adjudication of the merits. The school district was not prepared to make its case and, hence, settled. In the new Consent Decree, the Diversity Index did not use race. Substitutes for race, such as language of the mother and income were used. Nevertheless, the subjective purpose of using a Diversity Index was racial, as the success or failure of the Diversity Index is always discussed in terms of its racial impact.

gollark: I guess those are also WiFi devices now. But still.
gollark: Anyway, this is for WiFi devices, not phones.
gollark: And the signal strength is way easier to measure anyway.
gollark: The geographically nearest tower might not actually have the best signal.
gollark: IIRC it was originally just based on signal strength scanned by the phone.

References
  1. Beyond Black and White, Asian American Law Journal Vol 5 Article 13


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.